The Fact of the Person of Jesus Christ: Dietrich Bonhoeffer'sAct and Being Público
DeJonge, Michael Paul (2009)
Published
Abstract
This dissertation interprets the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer's (1906-1945) post-doctoral dissertation, Act and Being. I argue that it operates in the intellectual space cleared by Karl Barth, who places at the center of theological discussion the problem of transcendence, which says that the constructive, productive, and projective functions of human epistemological faculties make knowledge of a transcendent God impossible. In light of this problem, which reduces God and revelation to objects at human disposal, Barth argues that theology's conceptual basis must be a concept of contingent revelation. Barth articulates this contingency by treating revelation as the free 'act' of the God who is transcendent subject rather than object.
Bonhoeffer learns from Barth that the problem of transcendence requires theology to operate with a concept of contingent revelation, but Bonhoeffer finds Barth's understanding of contingency inadequate, since an act-concept of revelation cannot account for any continuous connection between the acting God and the human historical world. Bonhoeffer offers an alternative account of contingent revelation in the concept of 'person.' God is neither object nor subject but person, a historical being who acts. Only on this conceptual basis can theology maintain both the contingency and continuity of revelation.
Although the argument of Act and Being proceeds largely in philosophical terms, it is as its core a Lutheran theological argument. Barth's actualism, as Bonhoeffer puts it elsewhere, is a "Reformed actualism," reinterpreting in light of the problem of transcendence a traditional, Reformed or Calvinist understanding of revelation as the act or word of a sovereign God. Against this, Bonhoeffer develops the Lutheran understanding of revelation as the person of Jesus Christ. In the incarnation, God so fully enters the world that God acts out of historical being.
From Bonhoeffer's perspective, the superiority of the Lutheran person-concept of revelation, reflecting both the contingency and continuity of revelation, rests in its ability to fund a theology oriented to both the word and the world. It provides the leverage, therefore, to correct pre-Barthian theology's neglect of transcendence without bargaining away, as Bonhoeffer fears Barth does, attention to the historical world.
Table of Contents
Between Berlin and Barth
A theological impasse The person-concept of revelation
The Problem of Act and Being
'Act' and 'being' Philosophy and the problem of act and being
The problem of act and being defined Act-philosophy
Transcendental philosophy Idealism
Being-philosophy
Phenomenology Genuine ontology
Part A and the argument of Act and Being
Theological criticism of philosophy Philosophy and the argument of Act and Being
Barth's Reformed Actualism
Barth's act-theology
Bonhoeffer's presentation of Barth's act-theology Barth's act-theology and the issue of dialectic The Feuerbach problem and the elements of a solution
Barth's Reformed actualism
The subjective God's act of revelation The indirect communication of revelation Trinity Incarnation and indirect communication Confessional polemics and the person of Christ
Bonhoeffer's Lutheran Person-theology
Critical christology and Chalcedon
From an objective to a factual christology From 'How?' to 'Who?' From natures to person
Protestant christology: the present person of Christ Person, union, and the concept of revelation Hermeneutical christology
Bonhoeffer's Criticism of Barth
Discontinuities and the problem of historical existence Limits and the problem of transcendence Limits and the concept of revelation
Bonhoeffer's Alternative to Barth
Life in the church Concept of revelation The problem of act and being
Revelation as person Revelation, Christ, and the church Anthropology Epistemology
Lutheran Heideggerianism Evaluating Bonhoeffer's alternative to Barth
Charles Marsh Christiane Tietz
Bonhoeffer's Criticism of Being-Theology
Sin: being and thinking in Adam Being-theology
Revelation as an object Revelation as being per se Revelation as a process of consciousness
Karl Holl's theology of conscience
Bonhoeffer's criticism of Holl Marshaling Luther against the Luther Renaissance
Concrete Ethics
Discipleship Ethics Barth
About this Dissertation
| School | |
|---|---|
| Department | |
| Degree | |
| Submission | |
| Language |
|
| Research Field | |
| Palavra-chave | |
| Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
| Committee Members |
Primary PDF
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
The Fact of the Person of Jesus Christ: Dietrich Bonhoeffer'sAct and Being () | 2018-08-28 13:13:41 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|