The Effect of Transparency on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' Compliance Rates Público

Abstract

Despite states' acceptance of the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within the Western Hemisphere, many states fail to comply fully with its judgments (Cavallaro and Brewer 2007). Thus, this thesis focuses on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and seeks to understand the conditions in which states are more likely to implement judicial orders. A review of the literature on compliance tends to suggest that increased transparency can induce states to comply with judicial decisions (Vanberg 2005). This thesis tests this theory at the Inter-American Court using media coverage as a proxy for transparency. Specifically, I will evaluate whether increased media coverage is positively associated with compliance, especially as the level of democracy increases. If this theory is supported at the Inter-American Court, this will have profound implications for other human rights tribunals who may be able to use publicity as a means of inducing compliance.

Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 1

CARACAZO V. VENEZUELA........................................................................................ .2

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................ ....6

FIGURE 1:...............................................................................................................12

HYPOTHESES...........................................................................................................13

Table 1: Summary of Theories and Hypotheses...............................................................13

CHAPTER 3: BACKGROUND...........................................................................................13

ORGANS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM....................................................................13

SUBMITTING A CASE TO COURT...................................................................................17

ADJUDICATION OF A CASE..........................................................................................20

COMPLIANCE WITH A JUDGMENT.......................................................................... .......23

CHAPTER 4: EMPIRICS: QUALITATIVE................................................................... ........24

THOSE INTERVIEWED.................................................................................................24

QUESTIONS ASKED....................................................................................................25

RESULTS..................................................................................................................26

Self Interest Theory:..................................................................................................26

Transparency............................................................................................................27

Public support...........................................................................................................28

Dissemination of Information.........................................................................................29

Drawbacks to transparency..........................................................................................36

CHAPTER 5: EMPIRICS-QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH........................................... .................38

TABLE 2: AVERAGE POLITY SCORES...............................................................................41

DEPENDENT VARIABLE-COMPLIANCE...............................................................................41

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES.............................................................................................42

Table 3: Fairness of Proceedings...................................................................................43

Table 4: Difficulty of Compliance...................................................................................44

Table 5: Third Party Participation in favor of plaintiff.........................................................46

MEASURING MEDIA COVERAGE............................................................................. .........47

Table 6: Media Coverage Distribution..............................................................................50

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS............................................................................................ ..50

Table 7: Cross tabulation of compliance and regime type................................................. ..51

Table 8: Interaction between democracy and media coverage.............................................51

Table 9: Predicted probabilities of compliance...................................................................52

Table 10: Compliance with IACHR judicial orders................................................................53

Figure 2: Predicted Probability of Compliance................................................................. ..58

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION.............................................................................................58

FIGURE 3...................................................................................................................59

WORKS CITED.............................................................................................................63

APPENDIX A:...............................................................................................................72

APPENDIX B…………………………………………………………………………….................................................73

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement

• Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.

School	Emory College
Department	Political Science
Degree	BA
Submission	Honors Thesis
Language	English
Research Field	Political Science, International Law and Relations Political Science, General
Palavra-chave	compliance transparency human rights Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor	Staton, Jeffrey, Emory University
Committee Members	Reinhardt, Eric, Emory University Hartfield-Mendez, Vialla, Emory University

Última modificação

Primary PDF

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions
	The Effect of Transparency on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' Compliance Rates ()	2018-08-28 13:53:43 -0400	Press to Select an action Download

Supplemental Files

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions