Implementation of a Routine Screening of Relative Energy Deficiency Syndrome in Female Athletes Restricted; Files Only
Dianno, Maura (Spring 2025)
Abstract
Relative Energy Deficiency Syndrome (RED-s) can be explained as the short and long term health consequences of being in a continuous state of low energy availability (LEA).1 Consequences include key bodily functions slowing down such as the reproductive system, bone health, immunity, metabolism, cardiovascular health, and psychological health. Despite notable symptoms, defined diagnosis criteria, and treatment guidelines, RED-s persists in female athlete populations, especially aesthetic and endurance sports. Additionally, athletes often seek care from multiple medical professionals such as gynecologists, sports medicine doctors, cardiologists, and gastroenterologists before RED-s is discussed.2 Once RED-s is diagnosed however, athletes are often pulled from their sport and undergo expensive and extensive medical testing.
This paper tested the effectiveness of the implementation of a routine clinical screening athletes completed during key checkpoints of their season to monitor warning signs and habits that contribute to LEA. This would allow for earlier intervention leading to less severe consequences and less time away from the sport. Findings suggest that a screening is well accepted by a college track and field team and reflects expected trends and correlations. However, this paper also highlights the culture of college athletics, specifically track and field, and how different norms, assumptions, judgements, and knowledge gaps in women’s sports contribute to the development of RED-s and the effectiveness of a clinical screening in reduction of cases.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….…1
Literature and Context ……………………………………………………..……..4
Methods……………………………………………………..………………………..…..14
Results ……………………………………………………..…………………………….17
Interview Findings ……………………………………………………..……..…17
Perception of Injury and RED-s………………………………………….17
Nutrition Knowledge Gaps……………………………………………....19
Feasibility of Screening…………………………………………….……22
Preliminary Screening Data……………………………………………………...24
Secondary Screening Data……………………………………………………….27
Discussion……………………………………………………………………………..…30
Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….33
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..35
Appendix…………………………………………………………………………….…...37
About this Honors Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palavra-chave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |

Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
File download under embargo until 22 November 2025 | 2025-04-14 12:55:44 -0400 | File download under embargo until 22 November 2025 |
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|