REDUCING THE RISE OF POLARIZATION IN THE COURT THROUGH THE BRIDGING OF DOCTRINES: AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION THROUGH QUASI-ORIGINALISM Público
Algaal, Naji (Spring 2024)
Published
Abstract
This thesis aims to deconstruct the conventional methods of constitutional interpretation—liberal and conservative—with respect to Originalism and Living Constitutionalism to illustrate the parallels and differences within both frameworks’ origins and processes. It is through this philosophical juxtaposition that I will develop an alternative interpretive method. The resources I will be using include the Federalist Papers and cases from the Marshall Court, the Warren Court, Rehnquist Court, and Roberts Court. I will also be citing interviews and discussions from constitutional scholars and Supreme Court Justices—specifically Justices John Roberts and Elena Kegan—to substantiate my claims and proposed methodology for interpretation. This research seeks to challenge the traditional understandings of constitutional interpretation by offering a fresh perspective that incorporates historical and contemporary proponents of law. By critically analyzing the existing methods and their limitations, the study aims to provide an interpretive framework that balances the needs and values of American society with the “original public meaning” of the laws—preventing the polarization and politicization of the Supreme Court that grants justices legislative powers.
Table of Contents
Introduction 2
The Case for Originalism 5
Originalism: Principles of Interpretation 10
The Case for Living Constitutionalism 12
Living Constitutionalism: Dworkin’s Principles of Interpretation 15
Living Constitutionalism: Breyer’s Principles of Interpretation 27
Originalism v. Living Constitutionalism (Case by Case): Applying Principles 30
1. Roe v. Wade: The Case Facts & Question(s) 31
2. Roe v. Wade: The Majority Opinion 33
3. Roe v. Wade: Rehnquist’s Dissent 37
4. Roe v. Wade: Synthesizing the Court’s Analysis 41
The Rise in Polarization in the Court 43
Constructing the Middle Ground: Quasi-Originalism 48
1. Justice Roberts’s Case for Quasi-Originalism 49
2. Justice Kagan’s Case for Quasi-Originalism 51
Conclusion 55
Bibliography 58
About this Honors Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palabra Clave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
|
REDUCING THE RISE OF POLARIZATION IN THE COURT THROUGH THE BRIDGING OF DOCTRINES: AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION THROUGH QUASI-ORIGINALISM () | 2024-04-30 17:47:35 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|