Cognitive mechanisms of source memory in rhesus monkeys (Maccaca mulatta) Público

Zhu, Wenying (Spring 2019)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/v979v414x?locale=pt-BR
Published

Abstract

In humans, successful recognition of context relies on source memory. However, in rhesus monkeys, evidence for source memory is scant, and little is known about the underlying cognitive mechanisms that support how monkeys might discriminate between contexts. Thus, through a series of experiments, we aim to investigate memory processes supporting source memory in rhesus monkeys. In Experiment 1, monkeys were shown images associated with two contexts, separated with a five-minute interval. After each of the context 2 images, they were presented a recognition test, and were rewarded for selecting context 1 images. Across sessions, all monkeys showed a shift from selecting context 2images at test, to selecting the context 1 images. This result demonstrates a discrimination between contexts, akin to source memory. To assess the extent to which this discrimination is supported by active, working memory-like mechanisms, or a more passive familiarity judgement, follow-up experiments investigated how cognitive load, extended delay intervals between context 2 and recognition test, and amount of exposure for context 1 images impact selection accuracy. Results show extending the delay between context 2 and test disrupts monkeys’ performance. However, the exact roles of working memory, familiarity and recollection still remains to be further explored.

Table of Contents

Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1

Methods and Current Results………………………………………………………………………………………….........4

Subjects…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4

Apparatus………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4

Stimuli……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4

Training……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5

Experiment I……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6

Experiment II…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9

Experiment III………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11

Experiment IV………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12

General Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………....15

Citations………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….22

Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palavra-chave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificação

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files