Assessing the safety of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine administration among pregnant women: adverse event reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2014-2017 Público

Landazabal, Claudia (Spring 2018)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/sq87bt62q?locale=pt-BR
Published

Abstract

Introduction: There are over 79 million cases of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the United States (1).  Chronic cases of HPV can cause cervical, vulvar, vaginal, penile, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers (2).  Nine-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) can protect against the most prevalent disease types (3).  Although the HPV vaccine has not been causally associated with adverse outcomes of pregnancy or adverse events (AEs) in the developing fetus, it is not recommended that pregnant women receive it (4, 5).  However, some women of childbearing age might be inadvertently exposed during catchup vaccination (5-7).  This study aims to assess the safety of 9vHPV administration during pregnancy.

Methods: We searched the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, a national post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance system, for reports of pregnant women vaccinated with 9vHPV in the United States between December 10, 2014 and December 31, 2017 (8).  Reports and corresponding medical records (when available) were reviewed.  AEs were characterized as primary maternal, secondary maternal, primary infant, or secondary infant.  Primary maternal AEs were further classified as pregnancy-specific or nonpregnancy-specific.  Vaccination errors were noted.  Frequencies and percentages of AEs and vaccination errors were computed, and disproportionate reporting of AEs was assessed using proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) (9, 10).

Results: A total of 80 pregnancy reports were identified.  Sixty reports (73.2%) did not describe an AE and were submitted due to vaccine exposure during pregnancy.  The most frequently reported pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion (n = 3; 3.7%), followed by vaginal bleeding (n = 2; 2.4%).  Among nonpregnancy-specific AEs, injection site reaction (n = 3; 3.7%) was most common.  Just over one-fifth of reports described a vaccination error (n = 17; 21.3%).  The PRR analyses comparing 9vHPV and 4vHPV vaccines, as well as 9vHPV and inactivated influenza vaccines, did not reveal disproportional reporting for any AE.  Only codes for non-clinically important events exceeded the PRR threshold.

Discussion: No AE clusters or patterns of concern were observed among these pregnancy reports.  CDC routinely monitors the safety of 9vHPV in the United States and will continue to monitor the safety of this vaccine in pregnancy (11).

Table of Contents

Chapter I ...................................................................................................................................1

Background/Literature Review .............................................................................................1

Chapter II ................................................................................................................................10

Title, Authors, and Abstract ................................................................................................10

Introduction .........................................................................................................................12

Methods ...............................................................................................................................14

Results .................................................................................................................................18

Discussion ...........................................................................................................................20

Strengths & Limitations .................................................................................................23

Conclusion .....................................................................................................................24

References ...........................................................................................................................25

Tables ..................................................................................................................................36

 

Figures ................................................................................................................................40

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palavra-chave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Partnering Agencies
Última modificação

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files