Originalism, and its Effects on Judicial Decision-Making and the Attitudinal Model Público

Dara, Khurram T. (2011)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/pv63g0545?locale=pt-BR
Published

Abstract

Abstract
Originalism, and its Effects on Judicial Decision-Making and the Attitudinal Model
By Khurram T. Dara

For decades, an independent judiciary has been shown to have many empirical benefits to society. Impartiality has been shown to affect these benefits. Certainly, the way by which Supreme Court justices decide cases influences impartiality. The attitudinal model holds that U.S. Supreme Court jutices decide cases based on ideological preferences. But what if certain methods of judicial interpretation influence the extent to which ideological preferences play a role in the judicial decision-making process? I argue that the use of originalism as a judicial interpretive method attenuates the relationship between a justice's preferences and their vote direction. Using a probability model, we study the affect of my unique "Originalism Score" on the attitudinal model.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION...1
2. THEORY...5

The Attitudinal Model and Ideology
"Hybrid" Interaction of Originalism and the Attitudinal Model

3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND HYPOTHESES...16
4. RESULTS...23
5. CONCLUSIONS...30
6. REFERENCES...33
7. APPENDIX 1...35

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palavra-chave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificação

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files