CD8 T cell memory development is influenced by direct interactions with CD4 T cells and tissue localization during T cell activation and clonal expansion Público
Romagnoli, Pablo (2011)
Abstract
Immunological memory against intracellular pathogens is highly
dependant on the
number, quality and location of memory CD8 T cells, all features
defined during CD8 T
cell memory formation. In terms of quality formation, CD8 T cells
need CD4 T cells to
develop into effective memory CD8 T cells. Since murine CD8 T cells
do not transcribe
MHC class II genes, several models have proposed antigen-presenting
cells (APCs) as
intermediaries that allow CD8 T cells to receive CD4 T cell help.
Here, we demonstrate
that activated murine CD8 T cells possess MHC class II molecules
acquired from APCs
via a process called trogocytosis. Transferred MHC class II
molecules are functionally
competent and enable activated CD8 T cells to receive CD4 T cell
help enhancing their
recall responses upon challenge. These observations indicate that
direct CD8:CD4 T cell
interactions may significantly contribute to the development of
memory CD8 T cells.
The location in which CD8 T cells get activated can also influence
generation of
CD8 T cell memory. Naive CD8 T cells responding to infection in
different tissues
integrate signals that determine their phenotype and functional
properties as effector or
memory CD8 T cells. Here, we show that CD8 T cells responding to
acute LCMV
infection leave blood to populate several lymphoid tissues (spleen,
PLN, MLN and bone
marrow). We find that while the phenotype of LCMV-specific CD8 T
cells varies with
the tissue, CD8 T cells from bone marrow display a memory precursor
phenotype,
CD62LloCD25loLy6Chi different to the mixed phenotype observed in
CD8 T cells from
spleen or PLN 3 days post LCMV infection. Interestingly, T-bet is
absent in LCMV-
specific CD8 T cells from bone marrow, in contrast to the high
T-bet expression found on
LCMV-specific CD8 T cells in PLN and spleen. Differences in
phenotype also correlate
with the cytokine profile of CD8 T cells, detecting less
IFNγ-producers in bone marrow
than in spleen upon ex vivo stimulation. These findings suggest
that memory precursors
arise in bone marrow early during LCMV infection. Taken together,
we show two
unappreciated contributions to CD8 T cell memory
development.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Defining moments in the life of CD8 T
cells……………...1
1.1 Immunological
memory.…………………………………………………..2
1.2 CD8 T cell
activation……………………………………….……………..3
1.3 CD8 T cell
memory……………………...………………………………...4
1.4 CD4 T cell
help……………………………………….………….………..5
1.5 T:T
interactions………………………….…......….………….…………...10
1.5.1 MHC class II on T
cells…...……………….………..….………......11
1.5.2 Immunological
synapse…...………………….…………...…...…...13
1.5.3 Intercellular transfer of proteins and
Trogocytosis…...…………...15
1.6 CD8 T cell
migration………………………………….…….………..…...18
1.7
References…...……………….………………..….………….……….…...22
Chapter 2: CD8 T cell memory recall is enhanced by novel
direct
interactions with CD4 T cells enabled by MHC class II
transferred from APCs
…………............................................44
2.1
Abstract………………..…………………………………………………...45
2.2
Introduction………………………………………………………………...46
2.3 Materials and
Methods……………...……………………………………...48
2.3.1 Mouse
Strains……………...…………………………………...…...48
2.3.2 Pathogens and
infections……………...…………………...…...…...48
2.3.3 Cell suspensions and flow
cytometry……………….…...……...…...49
2.3.4
Peptides…...…………………..……………………...…………......49
2.3.5 Cell
culture…..………………..……………………...…………......50
2.3.6 In vitro CD4 T cell
differentiation…………………....…………......50
2.3.7 Adoptive
Transfer…………………………………….…………......51
2.3.8 Statistical
Analysis……...…………………………….…………......51
2.4
Results…….………………..……………………………....……………....52
2.4.1 MHC class II is present on recently activated murine CD8 T
cells
in vitro as well as in
vivo……….....................................................52
2.4.2 MHC class II is transiently present on responding
transgenic
CD8 T cells after
infection…..........................................................53
2.4.3 MHC class II is transferred onto CD8 T cells from
APCs….............54
2.4.4 MHC Class II on activated CD8 T cells mediate direct
stimulation
of experienced CD4 T
cells..….......................................................56
2.4.5 In vitro interactions between MHC Class II+ activated CD8 T
cells
and experienced CD4 T cells improve the in vivo recall
response
of CD8 T
cells..……………...........................................................57
2.5
Discussion………………..………………………………………………...59
2.6
Figures………………..…………………..………………………....……...65
2.7
Acknowledgements………………..………………..……………....……...80
2.8
Footnotes………………..………………..……………………........……...80
2.9
References………………..………………..……………....…………….....81
Chapter 3: Memory precursor phenotype is detected early on
CD8 T cells responding to acute LCMV infection
in bone
marrow…………….……………………………..…....89
3.1
Abstract………………..…………………………………………………..90
3.2
Introduction………………..…………………..………………………......91
3.3 Materials and
Methods………….……………..…………………………..94
3.3.1 Mouse
Strains………………..……...…..…………………...…......94
3.3.2 Pathogens and
Infections………...……..……………………...…...94
3.3.3 Cell suspensions and flow
cytometry…….…………..……...……...94
3.3.4
Peptides………………..………………..………………...………...95
3.3.5 Adoptive
Transfer………………..………………..…...…………....95
3.3.6 Statistical
Analysis…….………………..…………...……………...95
3.4
Results…….………………..……………………………....……………...96
3.4.1 Responder CD8 T cell locate to different lymphoid tissues
than
bystanders CD8 T cells and divide up to 10 times
during the first 3 days of LCMV
infection……………….…….....96
3.4.2 Responder CD8 T cells from bone marrow display a memory
precursor phenotype early during LCMV
infection……….....…..97
3.4.3 Endogenous CD8 T cells from bone marrow responding to
LCMV infection also display lower CD25
expressio..……….…..98
3.4.4 Lower percentage of IFNg-producer responder CD8 T cells
are found in bone marrow than in
spleen.……………...……......99
3.5
Discussion…….………………..…………………………….……...…....100
3.6
Figures…….………………..………….…………………….……….…..105
3.7
Acknowledgements….……..………….…………………….…………...115
3.8
Footnotes.……..………….…………………….………………………...115
3.9
References.………………....………….…………………….…………...116
Chapter 4:
Conclusions………………………………………...……………123
4.1 Why research on Immunological Memory is
important…...……..…...…124
4.2 Memory CD8 T cells and our research
findings……………...…..…...…124
4.3 How direct CD8:CD4 T cell interactions impact
the quality of CD8 T cell
memory...................................................125
4.4 How location impacts on CD8 T cell memory
formation……..…………129
4.5
Conclusions………………………………………………...…..……...…132
4.6
References………………………………………………...……....…...…134
List of Figures
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1: MHC class II is present on recently activated
murine
CD8 T cells in vitro as well as in
vivo………………………..65
Figure 2.2: MHC class II is transiently present on responding
transgenic CD8 T cells after
infection………………………..67
Figure 2.3: MHC class II is transferred onto CD8 T cells from
APCs…...69
Figure 2.4: MHC class II on activated CD8 T cells mediate
direct
stimulation of experienced CD4 T
cells……………….……..71
Figure 2.5: In vitro interactions between MHC class II+
activated
CD8 T cells and experienced CD4 T cells improve
the in vivo recall response of CD8 T
cells…………….……..72
Figure 2.6: MHC class II and CD54 is present around Day 2, 3 and
4
on gp33-specific CD8 T cells in MLN, spleen and PLN
respectively after LCMV
infection…………….…………….73
Figure 2.7: MHC class II is present only on specific CD8 T
cells
after activation in vitro and in
vivo…………….…………….74
Figure 2.8: MHC class II is not present on endogenous CD8 T
cells
that do not respond to LCMV infection in
vivo……………...76
Figure 2.9: CD4 T cells stimulation with activated CD8 T cells is
not due
to DC
contamination...…………………………………….....77
Figure 2.10: No difference in absolute numbers between
adoptively
transferred helped or unhelped CD8 T cells before
delayed
challenge………………………………………….....79
Chapter 3
Figure 3.1: Responder CD8 T cell locate to different lymphoid
tissues
than bystanders CD8 T cells and divide up to 10 times
during the first 3 days of LCMV
infection……….……..…..105
Figure 3.2: Responder CD8 T cells from bone marrow display a
memory
precursor phenotype early during LCMV
infection………...107
Figure 3.3: Endogenous CD8 T cells from bone marrow
responding
to LCMV infection also display lower CD25
expression…...108
Figure 3.4: Lower percentage of IFNg-producer responder CD8 T
cells
are found in bone marrow than in spleen
……….…………..109
Figure 3.5: Phenotype of bystander CD8 T cells remains
unchanged
after 3 days of LCMV
infection...…………………………...110
Figure 3.6: Responder CD8 T cells show similar activation
phenotype
in PLN, MLN and Liver after 3 days of LCMV
infection.….111
Figure 3.7: CD8 T cells responding to LCMV show similar
differentiation
markers in spleen, PLN and bone marrow
…………….....…112
Figure 3.8: Phenotype of endogenous bystander CD8 T cells
remains
unchanged after 3 days of LCMV infection regardless of
tissue location
……………………………………………....113
Figure 3.9: Responder CD8 T cells display similar Eomesodermin
in
different lymphoid tissues after 3 days of LCMV infection..114
About this Dissertation
| School | |
|---|---|
| Department | |
| Degree | |
| Submission | |
| Language |
|
| Research Field | |
| Palavra-chave | |
| Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
| Committee Members |
Primary PDF
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CD8 T cell memory development is influenced by direct interactions with CD4 T cells and tissue localization during T cell activation and clonal expansion () | 2018-08-28 14:24:45 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|