The Speculative Philosophy of History and Normativity: Habermas’ Middle Period Público

Abstract

The question of reason’s relationship to history poses a challenge for critical theory. If reason or rationality emerges out an historical process and is historically conditioned, not guaranteed metaphysically, on what normative and theoretical basis can present conditions be criticized as “irrational”? Critical theory must be able to posit something beyond what is merely given in the present historical moment without claiming to stand outside of history. The philosophy of history as a philosophical concept does not receive much attention, either from critical theorists or contemporary philosophers in general. It is usually taken for granted that however a critical theory tries to solve the difficulties raised by reason’s relationship to history, it can and must do so without a philosophy of history.

This dissertation is a revisitation of the role that philosophy of history plays in orienting the tasks and scope of critical theory through an examination of the middle period of Jürgen Habermas’ philosophical development. I make the case that Habermas’ split from his former mentors at the Frankfurt school marked by the Theory of Communicative Action ought to be understood as an attempt to resolve the dilemma posed by reason’s relationship to history without depending a speculative philosophy of history for its normative grounding. Through an analysis of his writings on historical materialism in the 1970s, I argue that Habermas not only has a philosophy of history, but that the philosophy of history does essential normative work for him and ultimately determines the orientation—and limitations—of his vision of critical theory. Habermas’ reformulation of critical theory on the basis of his theory of modernity shows the stubborn difficulty facing anyone undertaking the task of formulating a basis for normative critique while avoiding relying upon a philosophy of history. What the case of Habermas suggests, I conclude, is that there is something that critical theory has not yet satisfactorily resolved concerning the relationship between history and reason. It is necessary for critical theory to reapproach the philosophy of history as an open question.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Introduction…………………………………………………….…………1

Chapter 1: What is the Speculative Philosophy of History?

Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..7

Part 1: A Genealogical Account of the Speculative Philosophy of History…….……8

Part 2: Speculative versus Analytic Philosophy of History …………………............12

Part 3: Why the Speculative Philosophy of History?...................................................22

Concluding Remarks…………………………………………………………...…….29

Chapter 2: The Speculative Philosophy of History and Critical Theory

Introduction…………………………………………..………………………………32

Part 1: The TCA as the Crossroads of Critical Theory……………………………….36

Part 2: Habermas and the DOE…………………………………………………….…40

Part 3: The DOE in the TCA………………………………………………………….44

Part 4: Habermas Revisiting the DOE………………………………………………..55

Concluding Remarks …………………………………………………………………62

Chapter 3: The Philosophy of History in the Theory of Communicative Action

Introduction………………………………………………………………..………….64

Part 1: The Reconstructive Method…………………………………………………..68

Part 2: Reconstruction, Ontogenesis and Phylogenesis……………………………....70

Part 3: The Developmental Model of Social Evolution………………………………75

Part 4: Directionality and Progress……………………………………………………77

Part 5: The Evolution of Society and Its Future………………………………………82

Concluding Remarks ………………………………………………………………....86

Chapter 4: The Hidden Philosophy of History and Critical Theory’s New Tasks

Introduction……………………………………………………………………...……91

Part 1: CES and Habermas’ Critical Project………………………………………….92

Part 2: The Role of Philosophy……………………………………………………….99

Chapter 5: The Philosophy of History in Habermas’ Later Philosophy

Introduction………………………………………………………..…………………108

Part 1: Between Facts and Norms………………………………………………...….109

Part 2: System Complexity…………………………………………………………...117

Part 3: The Lifeworld………………………………………………………………...123

Concluding Remarks………………………………………………………………....134

Coda……………………………………………………………………….137

Bibliography………………………...…………………………………….140

About this Dissertation

Rights statement

• Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.

School	Laney Graduate School
Department	Philosophy
Degree	Ph.D.
Submission	Dissertation
Language	English
Research Field	Philosophy
Palavra-chave	critical theory normativity the Frankfurt School the philosophy of history Habermas
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor	Dr. John Lysaker, Emory University
Committee Members	Dr. Noëlle McAfee, Emory University Dr. Michael Sullivan, Emory University

Última modificação

Primary PDF

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions
	The Speculative Philosophy of History and Normativity: Habermas’ Middle Period ()	2020-07-30 18:16:02 -0400	Press to Select an action Download

Supplemental Files

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions