An assessment tool for the public opinion of the moral status of Artificial Intelligence Público
Hurley, Meghan (Spring 2021)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence’s rapidly progressing ability to plan actions and integrate and process information in a manner similar to humans, alongside an increasingly anthropomorphic conceptualization of AI’s underlying mechanisms has led experts in the fields of neuroscience, engineering, computer science, and philosophy to question whether or not AI has the ability to become conscious or sentient. Unclear criteria for defining consciousness and sentience as well as unclear criteria for determining moral status for humans, let alone non-human beings and entities makes it even more difficult to predict how AI with human-like abilities may interact with and function alongside humanity, or process how we will decide their moral and thus legal status in society. Considering that the public’s attitude and acceptance towards conscious AI will play a large role in deciding how AI are treated and whether or not they are respected as members of society, it is imperative to understand the public’s current opinions and perspective of the moral status of AI. This thesis aims to develop a robust assessment tool that can be used to neuroethically examine factors and themes crucial to the public’s opinion of the moral status of AI. The assessment tool was evaluated by conducting qualitative interviews with participants who offered insight into the clarity and effectiveness of the tool. A neuroethical analysis of the projected and emergent themes from the interviews influenced the refinement of the scenarios on the administered tool.
Table of Contents
Background and Significance of Project 1
The problem 1
Current AI scholarship and the future of AI 1
What gives beings moral status? 3
Substrate 4
Consciousness 5
Personhood and animal issues as precedence 8
The importance of the public 10
Possible influencing factors 11
Media portrayal 12
Goals and Objectives Stated 13
Methodology 14
Figure 1. Preliminary Concept Map 16
Table 1. Overview of participant information 17
Results 18
Figure 2. Final Concept Map 19
Table 2. Frequency and occurrence of Theme 1: AI Abilities 20
Table 2.1. Notable quotes from Theme 1: AI Abilities 21
Table 3. Frequency and occurrence of Theme 2: Potential Harm 22
Table 3.1. Notable quotes from Theme 2: Potential Harm 22
Table 4. Frequency and occurrence of Theme 3: Duty 23
Table 4.1. Notable quotes from Theme 3: Duty 23
Table 5. Frequency and occurrence of Theme 4: Utility 24
Table 5.1. Notable quotes from Theme 4: Utility 25
Discussion 28
Limitations 37
Conclusion 38
References 39
Figures Listed 45
Appendix A: Preliminary Questionnaire 46
Appendix B: Final Questionnaire 55
Appendix C: Verbal Consent Form 64
About this Honors Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palavra-chave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
An assessment tool for the public opinion of the moral status of Artificial Intelligence () | 2021-04-12 21:42:16 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|