The Structural Asymmetry and Scaling of Phylogenetic Trees Público

Fang, Hua (Spring 2021)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/g158bj39d?locale=es
Published

Abstract

Understanding the patterns and processes of evolution is very challenging. Because they carry inherent information about evolution, phylogenetic trees become a prevalent tool in evolutionary biology. In this work, we studied large-scale phylogenetic trees in terms of tree asymmetry and distribution of branch length. We used two indicators: the ratio of the size of smaller child clade to the size of parent clade and the ultrametric distances between two consecutive nodes. By comparing with a random null model and a critical model, we found that both the topology and timing of trees are scale-invariant and could be described by a power law distribution. This scale-invariance suggests that similar forces drive the evolution over a large range of scales. However, the observed patterns of several trees are better described by the null tree from the Markov process. Future works could attempt to explain this deviation.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.Introduction...................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Definitions about phylogenetic trees........................................................... 2

1.2 The critical model by Boettcher and Paczuski.......................................... 4

1.3 the markov model............................................................................................. 5

1.4 Asymmetric Tree structure............................................................................ 6

1.5 Ultrametricity.................................................................................................. 9

2. Methods.............................................................................................................. 12

2.1 Newick tree format........................................................................................ 12

2.2 data................................................................................................................... 13

2.3 implementation................................................................................................ 14

2.4 Asymmetric Tree structure.......................................................................... 14

2.5 Ultrametric distances................................................................................... 15

3. Results and Discussion.............................................................................. 15

3.1 Tree topology.................................................................................................. 15

3.2 Ultrametric distances................................................................................... 18

4. references........................................................................................................ 25

5. appendix.............................................................................................................. 31

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palabra Clave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificación

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files