Scriptures of the Real Público

Ramachandran, Shalini Deepika (2011)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/5d86p109s?locale=pt-BR
Published

Abstract

This thought experiment-thesis raises two fundamental questions: Do seemingly disparate
knowledge systems aspire toward similar goals? By juxtaposing the pursuits of different
disciplines, can we find new forms of communication that enable a richer production of public
knowledge and transform disciplinary boundaries into a generative space?
To address these questions, I compare the creative pursuits of Albert Einstein, father
of modern physics, and James Joyce, father of modern literature, in conversation with Jacques
Lacan, Sigmund Freud's protégé as the "Name-of-the-Father" of modern psychoanalysis. All of
these thinkers struggled with the inability of language to express lived experience fully. Lacan
called this occluded, ineffable realm "the Real"; Einstein called it "wonder"; and Joyce called it
"drama." While this thesis focuses primarily on Einstein's and Joyce's struggles against the
conventions of their fields, Lacanian psychoanalysis proposes clues as to how these thinkers'
troubled relationships with women impacted their choices to traverse revolutionary intellectual
paths.
All three thinkers find that Real knowledge, as opposed to knowledge of reality, is only
accessible experientially, gained by exploring the lacks within conventions and language. But as
prolific writers, Joyce and Einstein do not eschew language completely; rather, their use of word-
play, image-play, and thought experiments empowers language by giving it an experiential
component, thereby creating public knowledge that can be "re-played" by readers again and
again.
Yet disciplinary differences problematize free reign of this "wonder." Science relies on
agreement upon evidence to propagate concepts and can thus obscure the need for
epistemological inquiry of conventions (until a heretic Einstein comes along). Literature does
allow itself to resonate with infinite, Real human truths-"personal woe," as Joyce wrote. But
literary criticism therefore remains unable to publicly demonstrate an objective value for
investigating literary "play" as science can for its findings, through falsifiable experiments.
Joyce's and Einstein's most creative works amount to powerful calls against creating
expansive, "complete" theories of reality. Diving into the fundamental lack in their disciplines,
the two instead discover ab-sens (playing on the French word sens, as in the senses or a "sense of
reality"): the experiential knowledge of silence, the Real.

Table of Contents

Movements Prelude: What is Realism?...................................................................................................1

First Movement: Fathers Without Motherlands......................................................................18

Second Movement: The Quanta of History............................................................................41

Third Movement: The Cracks in the ‘Ramparts'.....................................................................65

Fourth Movement: Thinkers at Play………………........................................................................91

Coda: Reality vs. reality: Big Truth or little truths? ..............................................................135

Works Cited....................................................................................................................146

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palavra-chave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificação

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files