Cutaneus Trunci Muscle Reflex as a Model for Neural Plasticity after Spinal Cord Injury Público
Malone, Patrick Stephen (2012)
Published
Abstract
Cutaneus Trunci Muscle Reflex as a Model for Neural Plasticity after Spinal Cord Injury Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in neuronal plasticity that causes alterations in sensory processing. A physiological model of neural plasticity that could be analyzed quantitatively after injury could greatly advance our understanding of plasticity after SCI. The cutaneus trunci muscle (CTM) reflex produces a skin shrug and is mediated by a 3 neuron circuit: C and Aδ afferents in segmental dorsal cutaneous nerves (DCNs), ascending propiospinal interneurons, and the CTM motoneuron pool.
Female Long Evans rats were divided into 4 experimental groups and analyzed at 3 time points after right T10 hemisection: 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and uninjured controls. Animals were stimulated at C fiber stimulation strength (5 mA, 250 µs pulse width, 1 and 5 Hz) at DCNs L01, T12, T08, and T06 bilaterally and both the Aδ and C-fiber evoked left CTM neurogram signals were recorded and processed. The profile of the hemisection was reconstructed in the cross-sectional plane. Responses were compared between injured (contralateral to CTM recording site) and uninjured (ipsilateral) sides.
The contralateral/ipsilateral early response ratio was significantly higher 6 weeks after injury at L01 (1 Hz) and the late response ratio was significantly higher at T08 (5 Hz) 6 weeks after injury compared to 3 weeks after injury. Analysis of individual sides showed more significant changes on the left side (contralateral to hemisection) and above the level of injury. There was no correlation between extent of hemisection and neurogram, suggesting that anatomy does not easily predict physiology. An increased stimulus response could be characterized as "nociceptive hypereflexia" and raises the possibility of the CTM reflex as an animal model for neuropathic pain after SCI.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. METHODS 5
2.1. ANIMALS 5
2.2. SPINAL CORD HEMISECTION SURGERIES 5
2.3. CTM RECORDINGS - SURGERY 6
2.4. CTM RECORDINGS - STIMULATION 7
2.5. CTM RECORDINGS - POST PROCESSING 8
2.6. ANALYSIS WINDOWS 8
2.7. HEMISECTION CHARACTERIZATION 8
2.8. STATISTICAL TESTS 9
2.9. CONTRIBUTIONS 10
3. RESULTS
3.1. CTM REFLEX IN UNINJURED ANIMALS
11
3.2. CTM REFLEX IN INJURED ANIMALS - CONTRALATERAL/IPSILATERAL
RESPONSE 12
3.3. CTM REFLEX IN INJURED ANIMALS - INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES
13
3.4. CTM REFLEX AND HEMISECTION - ANATOMY VS. PHYSIOLOGY
14
4. DISCUSSION 15
5. REFERENCES 19
6. TABLES AND FIGURES 24
6.1. FIGURE 1 CTM REFLEX CIRCUIT DIAGRAM 24
6.2. FIGURE 2 DORSAL CUTANEOUS NERVES AND CTM MOTOR NERVE
BRANCHES 25
6.3. FIGURE 3 DISSECTED BRANCH OF CTM MOTOR NERVE
26
6.4. FIGURE 4 EXPERIMENTAL PREPARATION 27
6.5. FIGURE 5 NEUROGRAM PREPARATION PROCESS 28
6.6. FIGURE 6 REPRESENTATIVE IMAGE OF HEMISECTION STAINING AND
MEASUREMENT. 29
6.7. FIGURE 7 FALSE COLOR PLOT OF UNINJURED AND INJURED STIMULUS
RESPONSES 30
6.8. FIGURE 8 FALSE COLOR PLOT OF UNINJURED AND INJURED STIMULUS
RESPONSES 31
6.9. FIGURE 9 CONTRALATERAL/IPSILATERA RESPONSE RATIO IN
UNINJURED ANIMALS 32
6.10. FIGURE 10 CONTRALATERAL/IPSILATERAL RESPONSE RATIOS IN
INJURED ANIMALS 33
6.11. FIGURE 11 CONTRALATERAL/IPSILATERAL RESPONSE RATIOS AT L01
AND T08 34
6.12. TABLE 1 STATISTICAL TESTS COMPARING INJURED TO UNINJURED
ANIMALS 35
6.13. FIGURE 12 CTM NEUROGRAMS AND RECONSTRUCTIONS 1 WEEK AFTER
INJURY 36
6.14. TABLE 2 HEMISECTION DATA 37
6.25. FIGURE 13 CENTRAL PROJECTIONS OF IB4 POSITIVE C FIBERS
38
About this Honors Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palavra-chave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
|
Cutaneus Trunci Muscle Reflex as a Model for Neural Plasticity after Spinal Cord Injury () | 2018-08-28 10:52:20 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|