Private Well Regulations Across the United States Público
Bowen, Kristina (2017)
Published
Abstract
Purpose: The goal of this study is to characterize the potential vulnerabilities of private well users to contamination by describing the major themes in private well regulations and determining how states differ in their requirements.
Methods: From May to August 2016, two reviewers identified state regulations and categorized each statute according to how it applied to private wells. Results were obtained independently by each reviewer and discussed until consensus. Differences between states were summarized by a principal components analysis.
Results: Half of the variation in well regulations across states was explained by the first two principal components. The first principal component (PC1), explaining 34% of the total variation, distinguished states with less private well regulation from states with more regulation. The second principal component (PC2), explaining 16% of the total variation, distinguished between two sets of regulations. Regulations for design, drilling/construction, inspection, and abandonment increased a state's PC2 score, while regulations for permits, maintenance, water quality, selling a home or property, and rental properties decreased a state's PC2 score. States with a score of zero either had no regulations or had regulations in both categories. Florida and Connecticut had more private well regulations overall (PC1) than other states. Hawaii and Indiana had the highest scores for PC2, indicating the regulations encompass design, drilling/construction, inspection, and abandonment. New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Minnesota had the lowest scores for PC2 illustrating their regulations address permits, maintenance, water quality, selling a home or property, and rental properties.
Conclusion: States vary in the extent and nature of their private well regulations. This policy heterogeneity may leave consumers of private well water differentially vulnerable to water contamination and associated health hazards. The potential relevance of these policy differences for geographic health disparities merits further investigation.
Table of Contents
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1-2
Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3-5
Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5-7
Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7-10
Conclusion and Recommendations.……………………………………………………………………………………………………….10
References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11-12
Figure 1………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13
Table 1…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
Figure 2………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….15
Figure 3…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………16-17
Supplemental Material.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….18-22
About this Master's Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palavra-chave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Partnering Agencies |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
|
Private Well Regulations Across the United States () | 2018-08-28 16:22:49 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|