Modified Functional Principal Component Regression Open Access

Masterson, Scott (Spring 2024)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/1n79h560c?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Using simulated temperature data as a proof of concept, we present a novel approach to prediction via the development and application of Modified Functional Principal Component Regression (MFPCR). By employing bivariate splines over triangulations in a functional linear regression model, this study offers a proof of concept for the modified approach that include additional data to improve the Function Principal Component Regression (FPCR). The mock temperature prediction problem has few complexities and clear influencing factors. Our comparative analysis of MFPCR and FPCR reveals insights into predictive accuracy, uncertainty quantification, and the spatial distribution of functional data, setting the stage for more precise neighborhood-level forecasting in future investigations. 

Table of Contents

1 Abstract 2

2 Introduction and Background 2

3 Modified Functional Principal Component Regression 5

3.1 Autoregressive Process........................ 6

3.2 Computational Method Outline: .................. 8

4 Simulated Temperature Data 9

4.1 Constructing a Temperature Data Set ............... 10

4.2 Topological Features ......................... 10

4.3 North-South Effect.......................... 10

4.4 Hourly Variation ........................... 10

4.5 Seasonality .............................. 11

4.6 Adding Noise to the Signal ..................... 12

4.7 Combining the Features to Generate the Data. . . . . . . . . . . 12

5 Simulated Temperature Experiments 13

5.1 Fixed and Adjusted Attributes of the Simulations . . . . . . . . . 13

5.2 Principal Component Analysis ................... 14

5.3 Assessing the Prediction Function through MSE Comparison Amongst Adjusted Attributes ......................... 17

5.3.1 Base Case: Mountain Valley................. 18

5.3.2 Altered Input Function ................... 19

5.3.3 Weight Adjustments ..................... 19

5.3.4 Noise ............................. 19

5.3.5 Number of Eigenvalues.................... 20

5.3.6 Overall MSE Comparison .................. 20

6 Comparing the Predictions 21

6.1 MFPCR vs. FPCR.......................... 22

6.2 Comparing Prediction Functions with Updated Station Data . . 22

7 Conclusion and Extension to the Ground-Level Ozone Application 25 

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files