South African College Students' Attitudes Regarding Smoke-Free Policies in Public Spaces, Private Spaces, and on Campus Öffentlichkeit

Narula, Shana Kaur (2011)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/0z708x050?locale=de
Published

Abstract

South African College Students' Attitudes Regarding Smoke-Free Policies in Public Spaces, Private Spaces, and on Campus
By Shana K. Narula

Tobacco control policies have been increasingly implemented globally. Thus, we examined smoking behavior and attitudes and implementation of private smoking bans among college students in South Africa. An online survey was completed by 130 University of Cape Town students; 4 focus groups among 27 college smokers were also conducted. Among the survey sample, 46.6% were female, 53.4% were White, and 41.5% smoked in the past 30 days (i.e., current smokers). Significant predictors of current smoking included being male (OR=0.34, p=.03), more friends that smoke (OR=1.34, p=.03), more frequently consuming alcohol in the past 30 days (OR=1.09, p=.02), and more days of marijuana use (OR=1.12, p=.15). Focus group data indicated that social factors (i.e., peer or familial) were major influences for smoking initiation and maintenance. While participants reported attempting to quit, common triggers for relapse and barriers to quit included stress, social environments, alcohol consumption, varying home restrictions, and the lack of policy enforcement. Survey data indicated that 6.8% disapproved of a public ban, 4.9% disapproved of smoke-free workplaces, 17.5% disapproved of restaurant bans, and 37.9% disapproved of smoke-free bars. Less negative attitudes toward smoking were associated with being younger (Coefficient=-0.67, p=.03), more days of smoking in the past 30 days (Coefficient=0.70, p<.001), and having more friends that smoke (Coefficient=1.40, p=.02). In terms of campus policies, 20.4% disapproved of the current smoking policies (i.e., no smoking in university buildings), and 39.8% disapproved of a complete campus-wide ban. While 10.7% stated less likelihood of attending the college if it had a complete ban, 13.6% reported being more likely to attend. Focus group data indicated that enforcement of public and campus policies was a barrier to maintaining smoke-free policies and reducing smoking in Cape Town. In regard to private restrictions, 73.8% had complete car bans; 67.0% had complete home bans. Despite high levels of support for smoke-free policies, smoking is highly prevalent among South African college students. Future tobacco control efforts must focus on the enforcement of existing public and campus policies in South Africa.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents
Introduction...1
Literature Review...8
Specific Aims...12

Methodology...13

Naturalistic Observations...13
Survey Research...14
Focus Group Research...18

Results...20

Naturalistic Observations...20
Survey Research...21
Focus Group Research...23

Limitations...31
Conclusions...32
References...33


Result Tables:
Table 1: Naturalistic Observations...37
Table 2: Survey Participant Characteristics...38
Table 3: Bivariate analyses examining correlates of current smoking status...40
Table 4: Multivariate model identifying factors related to current smoking status...41
Table 5: Regression models predicting reactions to smoke-free policies in public, on campus, and in private spaces...42
Table 6: Focus group participant characteristics...43
Table 7: Reactions to smoking policies in public, on campus, and in private spaces...44


Figures:
Figure 1: Number of days smoked among college student smokers...46
Figure 2: Percent of students reporting reactions to public policies, campus policies, and private policies...47


Appendices:
Appendix A: Tobacco Products Control Act and Amendments of South Africa...49
Appendix B: Percentage changes in smoking indicators in South Africa (1993 to 2007)...50
Appendix C: Main provisions of the WHO FCTC...51
Appendix D: Behavioral Ecological Model Schematic...52
Appendix E: University Student Smoking Survey...53
Appendix F: Focus Group Moderator's Guide...62
Appendix G: Focus Group Questionnaire...69
Appendix H: Survey Consent Form...72
Appendix I: Focus Group Consent Form...74

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Stichwort
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Partnering Agencies
Zuletzt geändert

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files