Anti-bacterial Potential of the Genus Rubus Público

Mendelsohn, Matthew A. (2017)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/00000077m?locale=pt-BR
Published

Abstract

With the decreased efficacy of many antibiotics in the face of rising drug resistance, there is an urgent need for the development of new and alternative therapeutics to combat this looming crisis. A novel approach to killing resistance bacteria utilizes active compounds to inhibit bacterial defense mechanisms, thereby increasing the efficacy of current antibiotics. Previously, an extract prepared from the roots of Rubus ulmifolius, was shown to inhibit biofilm formation in S. aureus, a major bacterial defense mechanism, and significantly improve biofilm clearance when used concomitantly with an antibiotic. The present study investigates the chemistry, bioactivity and anti-biofilm properties against S. aureus of eight different Rubus species and their various plant parts to see if the activity and chemistry are conserved across the genus.

Liquid extraction and partitioning techniques were employed to prepare 4 refined partitions and 1 crude extract for each of the 8 Rubus species and 11 plant parts tested. Broth dilution methods were employed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) after 18 hours of growth using an optical density reading. Anti-biofilm effects were assessed by growing biofilms for 24 hours, then fixing and staining with crystal violet. After washing, the biofilms were eluted, optical density readings were taken, and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBIC) were calculated. The presence of ellagic acid and two of its glycosidic derivatives was assessed using HPLC, matching retention times and UV spectrums of our extracts to the three standards prepared.

Ellagic acid was found to be present within every Rubus species; however, none of the species contained either of the two derivatives examined. Extracts prepared from each plant species exhibited an MIC50 at concentrations ranging from 32 - 256 µg/ml. Each species tested inhibited biofilm formation at a concentration below where you see growth inhibition. Two extracts in particular, 730 and 735D, potently inhibited biofilm formation at 8 µg/ml without inhibiting growth significantly and therefore represent promising candidates for the development of novel natural product inhibitors of biofilm formation. We recommend further studies and bioassay-guided fractionation be done to develop these compositions into antibiotic adjuvant therapeutics against S. aureus.

Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1

My inspiration

Looming crisis of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Natural products as alternative treatments: an ethnobotanical approach to drug discovery

Project aims and research questions

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 6

Why Blackberries?

Chemistry and bioactivity of the genus Rubus

An investigation of eight distinct Rubus species

Staphylococcus aureus and Antimicrobial resistance

Biofilms and Staphylococcus aureus

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS 38

Literature Review

Botanical Materials

Generation of Rubus Extracts

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Assay (Growth Inhibition)

Assessment of Biofilm Formation

High Performance Liquid Chromatography

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS 44

Extraction

Liquid/Liquid Partitions

S. aureus growth and biofilm inhibition

MIC & MBIC

HPLC Analysis

CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 81

The inhibitory effects of various Rubus species against S. aureus

Anti-biofilm activity of Rubus against S. aureus

Ellagic acid, Ellagic Acid derivatives, and Rubus

The Potential of Biofilm Inhibitors

Limitations and Future Directions

Conclusion

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palavra-chave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificação

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files