Understanding Variation in Self-Derivation Performance: Individual and Study-Level Meta-Analyses of Bauer Memory Lab Self-Derivation Studies Público

Beattie, Emily (Spring 2021)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/v692t742k?locale=es
Published

Abstract

The current research was an examination of individual and study-level factors that explain the variation in performance on derivation of new semantic knowledge through integration of information. To examine these factors across all studies that examine self-derivation in the Bauer Memory Lab at Emory University, I used an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis and a traditional study-level meta-analysis. Using the IPD meta-analysis, I used six studies to examine the associations of verbal comprehension, semester (fall or spring) and the half of the semester, age, race, and gender with self-derivation, while controlling for the specific study. In the study-level meta-analysis, I used 11 studies to examine the associations of the presentation of facts modality, number of facts presented to learn, and assessment method with self-derivation. In the IPD meta-analysis, I found that age and verbal comprehension were significantly associated with self-derivation performance across studies and explained a significant portion of the variability in performance. Additionally, in the study-level meta-analysis, I found that none of the predictors explained any of the variability across studies. The present research strengthens previous findings that verbal comprehension is implicated with self-derivation performance by showing that this trend is consistent across multiple studies. In addition, this study provides greater insight into why some people perform vastly better at self-derivation tasks than others. Ultimately, these findings provide important general findings regarding factors implicated in the variation of self-derivation performance and establish future research goals to enhance understanding of semantic learning. 

Table of Contents

Introduction…………………………………………….….1

Study 1: Methods………………………………………….9

Study 1: Results……………………………………….…..13

Study 1: Discussion……………………………………….15

Study 2: Methods……………………………………….....16

Study 2: Results………………………………………...…19

Study 2: Discussion…………………………………….....20

General Discussion………………………………………..21

References……………………………………………...….27

Tables and Figures…………………………………….…..31 

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Palabra Clave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Última modificación

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files