Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in humans, wildlife, and livestock in and around Gombe National Park, Tanzania 公开

Elchoufi, Deema (2014)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/tm70mv401?locale=zh
Published

Abstract

Purpose: Habitat overlap increases the risk of bacterial exchange between humans and wildlife, threatening human health and wildlife conservation. Antibiotic resistance (AR), like disease, can spread between wildlife, livestock, and humans, serving as a possible proxy for disease spillover. In Gombe National Park, Tanzania, little is known about the prevalence of AR in the ecosystem. This project examined the prevalence of sulfonamide resistance genes in humans, livestock, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), and baboons (Pabio anubis). Further, we examined risk factors for resistance acquisition in the Gombe ecosystem, hypothesizing that the Mitumba chimpanzee community would have higher AR prevalence than the Kasekela community due to its proximity to Mwamgongo, the village bordering the park.

Methods: From March 2010 to February 2011, fecal samples were collected from humans (n=178), livestock (n=98), and wildlife (n=131) from Mitumba and Kasekela (park communities) and Mwamgongo (village outside the park). At time of collection, human subjects were surveyed for socio-demographic (sex, age, profession, etc.) and health data (diarrheal illness, medication usage, water usage, etc.). DNA extracted from samples was screened for AR genes sul1 and sul2. Previously collected data on prevalence of SIV and Cryptospiridium were used as possible risk factors for the chimpanzee analyses. Chi-square tests of independence, Fisher's Exact Tests, and McNemar's Tests were used to measure associations between risk factors and sul positivity.

Results: Kasekela had the highest prevalence of AR genes for human and chimpanzees (93.2% and 28.8%, respectively). All wildlife and livestock had some level of resistance (26.2% for chimpanzees, 36.2% for baboons, 77.8% for dogs, 7.1% for sheep, 12% for goats). Humans residing in Kasekela were four times more likely to have AR (OR=4.010) than Mitumba. Positivity for sul1 related to positivity for sul2 in humans (p<0.001) and chimps (p=0.0253). There was a strong statistical significance for chimpanzees having SIV and AR genes (p=0.020).

Conclusion: Humans seem to be the reservoir for AR genes to wildlife, regardless of human density. The established prevalence of AR genes in the wildlife is a call for concern. Limiting human interactions with wildlife and presence in the park is needed to reduce transmission risk.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Background 1

Antibiotic resistance and wildlife 1

Gombe National Park 2 Sulfonamide Antimicrobials 4

Methods 5

Study area 5 Fecal Sample collection 6

Survey Instrument 7

Nucleic Acid Extraction 7

Polymerase Chain Reaction and Gel Electrophoresis 8

Data analysis 9

RESULTS 9

Descriptive statistics 9

analysis of Risk factors 10

DISCUSSION 11

Antibiotic resistance in Kasekela 12

Antibiotic resistance in wildlife 13

Differences in sul1 vs. sul2 15

SIV Status and sul postivity 15

CONCLUSIONS 16

REFERENCES 18

TABLES AND FIGURES 21

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research field
关键词
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
最新修改

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files