Spatial and temporal criticality emerge from latent-variable models Pubblico

Morrell, Mia (Spring 2020)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/sj1392966?locale=it
Published

Abstract

Understanding activity of large populations of neurons is difficult due to the combinatorial complexity of possible cell-cell interactions. A remedy is to note that many systems may be macroscopically described with models simpler than the system's microscopic behavior. This has been probed via a coarse-graining procedure on experimental neural recordings, which shows over two decades of scaling in free energy, variance, eigenvalue spectra, and correlation time [1], hinting that a mouse hippocampus operates in a critical regime. We investigated whether this scaling behavior could be explained as a result of coupling the neural population to latent dynamic stimuli. We conducted simulations of conditionally independent binary neurons coupled to a small number of long-timescale stochastic fields with and without periodic spatial stimuli (depicting neural place cells) and replicated the coarse-graining shown in [1]. In a biologically relevant regime, we find that much of the observed scaling [1] may be recreated by this model. This suggests that aspects of the scaling may be explained by coupling to hidden dynamic processes, a ubiquitous trait of neural systems.

[1] L. Meshulam et al. arXiv:1812.11904 [physics.bio-ph], 2019

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

List of Figures ………… iii

List of Tables ………… xii

I. Introduction ………… 2

A. Motivation ………… 2

II. Experimental Background ………… 3

A. Experimental setup ………… 3

B. Place fields ………… 3

III. Theory ………… 4

A. Spin models applied to neural systems ………… 4

B. Coarse-graining schemes ………… 6

1. Coarse-graining in real space ………… 6

2. Coarse-graining in momentum space ………… 6

C. Critical Behavior and Scaling ………… 7

1. A review of critical phenomena ………… 7

2. The Ornstein-Zernike correlation form ………… 8

D. Predictions of scaling laws ………… 11

1. Scaling in activity variance ………… 11

2. Free energy scaling ………… 13

3. Scaling in eigenvalue spectra ………… 14

4. Scaling in correlation time ………… 14

5. Flow to a non-gaussian fixed point ………… 15

E. Theoretical Motivation ………… 15

1. Zipf’s Law ………… 15

2. Criticality emerges from large systems obeying Zipf’s Law ………… 16

3. Large systems coupled to latent stimuli obey Zipf’s Law ………… 18

4. Requirements for our model ………… 21

IV. Methods ………… 21

A. The model ………… 21

V. Results ………… 23

1. Scaling of activity variance ………… 25

2. Scaling in eigenvalue spectra ………… 26

3. Scaling in correlation time ………… 26

4. Flow to a non-gaussian fixed point ………… 27

5. Experimental agreement ………… 28

A. Discussion ………… 29

VI. Supplementary Information ………… 29

A. Supplementary figures ………… 29

B. Parameter sweeps ………… 30

1. Varying cell stimuli ………… 31

2. Varying the latent fields multiplier ………… 35

3. Varying the number of latent fields ………… 35

4. Varying the latent fields time constant ………… 39

5. Varying the probability of coupling to a latent fields ………… 39

6. Varying the penalty term ………… 39

7. Varying the multiplier ………… 40

References ………… 40

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Parola chiave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Ultima modifica

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files