Severity of rhinovirus infection in hospitalized adults is unrelated to genotype Public

McCulloch, Denise Judith (2014)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/s4655g76g?locale=fr
Published

Abstract

Background: Differences in the severity of clinical illness due to rhinovirus (RV) species type (A, B or C) have been found in pediatric populations. In adults, however, the relationship between RV species and clinical illness is less well characterized.

Objectives: To determine whether RV species is associated with more severe clinical illness in adults.

Study design: Seventy-two RV-positive viral respiratory samples from adult patients were sequenced and analyzed phylogenetically. The clinical features and severity of illness were compared for the different RV species using ANOVA. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between RV type and severity of illness.

Results: Phylogenetic analysis identified three distinct clusters as RV-A (54%), B (19%) or C (26%) species. The groups were demographically similar except that in the RV-C group, there were more females (p=0.05), and in the RV-B group, a larger proportion of patients had diabetes (p=0.04). In an unadjusted model, patients with RV-B infection as compared to patients with RV-C infection were significantly more likely to have the composite outcome variable of death or ICU admission (p=0.03), but this effect diminished when controlling for patient sex. A logistic model of the relationship between RV species and adverse outcomes produced nonsignificant odds ratios when controlling for patient sex.

Conclusions: Infection with RV-A or RV-B was associated with greater severity of illness in an adult population; however, the association disappeared after multivariate analysis controlling for the confounding effect of gender.

Table of Contents

Background....................................................................8 - Introduction...................................................................8 - Rhinovirus Virology and Taxonomy....................................9 - Rhinovirus species and severity of clinical illness................10 Methods.......................................................................12 Results.........................................................................16 Discussion....................................................................20 - Strengths and Limitations...............................................22 - Conclusion...................................................................23 - Implications.................................................................23 - Future Directions..........................................................24 Tables..........................................................................30 Figures and Figure Legends............................................38 Appendix......................................................................39

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Mot-clé
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Partnering Agencies
Dernière modification

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files