Assessing the Validity of Sexual Network Degree Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Prospective Cohort Data Public
Uong, Stephen (Spring 2018)
Published
Abstract
Background: Sexual network degree (count of ongoing partners) plays a critical role in HIV/STI transmission dynamics. It is typically measured using cross-sectional data, which may result in biased estimates because of uncertainty about future predictions about partnerships.
Methods: We evaluated the validity of a cross-sectional degree measure with a prospective cohort study of men who have sex with men (MSM). At baseline, men were asked about recent sexual partnerships, and the ongoing status of those partnerships was reevaluated at 6-month follow-up. With Poisson regression, we quantified the confirmed degree as a function of baseline degree. With logistic regression, we assessed the overall probability and predictors of agreement between degree measured at these two time points.
Results: Baseline degree of all partnership types was over-predictive of confirmed degree reported at 6-month follow-up for values of 1 up to 5 for baseline degree and under-predictive for values of 0 for baseline degree in stratified and unstratified models. Confirmed degree was predicted to be 0.28, 0.59, and 1.25 with a baseline degree of 0, 1, and 2 among main partnerships, respectively. Confirmed degree was predicted to be 0.26, 0.44, 0.74, 1.24, 2.09, and 3.51 with a baseline degree of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 among casual partnerships, respectively. The odds of reported ongoing status agreement were 1.41 (95% CI, 0.96, 2.07) and 1.85 (95% CI, 1.06, 3.21) times as that in white-white compared to black-black partnerships and in those who had agreement of partnership exclusivity compared to those who had no agreement, respectively.
Conclusion: Network degree may be overestimated in most cases if measured with cross-sectional study designs. Future studies and prevention interventions depending on degree measures should account for this bias through adjustment of their estimates.
Table of Contents
Introduction .......................................... 1
Methods ............................................... 3
Study Design .................................. 3
Measures ........................................ 4
Statistical Analysis ........................... 5
Results ................................................. 6
Discussion ............................................ 10
References ........................................... 15
Tables .................................................. 19
Table 1 ........................................... 19
Table 2 ........................................... 20
Table 3 ........................................... 21
Table 4 ........................................... 22
Figures ................................................. 23
Figure 1 .......................................... 23
Figure 2 .......................................... 24
About this Master's Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Mot-clé | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Partnering Agencies |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
|
Assessing the Validity of Sexual Network Degree Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Prospective Cohort Data () | 2018-04-19 19:41:37 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|