Regional mechanisms governing developmental and regenerative morphology of intrahepatic bile ducts Restricted; Files Only

Hrncir, Hannah (Spring 2025)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/m326m329j?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Intrahepatic bile ducts (IHBDs) form a complex, hierarchical network, with a large bile duct entering at the liver hilum and progressively branching into smaller ducts that terminate as ductules. IHBDs are critical for liver function and chronic loss of IHBD function will lead to liver failure. However, the processes governing their morphogenesis beyond initial specification remain largely undefined. While IHBD remodeling is a key feature of both development and liver disease, the mechanisms regulating this process are not well understood. IHBD remodeling following injury is shaped by the response of biliary epithelial cells to stress, which we characterize by key hallmarks: cell death, proliferation, transdifferentiation, senescence, and the acquisition of a neuroendocrine phenotype. Due to limitations in imaging and analysis, global 3D IHBD remodeling during development and disease remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we employ large-volume light sheet microscopy and quantitative analysis to characterize IHBD architecture across development, homeostasis, and injury. We demonstrate that the transcription factor Sox9 is required for postnatal branching morphogenesis of ductules by repressing Activin A. This identifies a previously unrecognized postnatal regulatory mechanism distinguishing duct and ductule formation. Additionally, we establish a 3D imaging and computational pipeline to quantitatively assess IHBD structure in both mouse and human liver tissues. Using this approach in models of cholestasis and hepatocellular injury, we identify region-specific IHBD remodeling, including the formation of IHBD diverticula on large ducts following cholestasis. Using high resolution 3D imaging, we visualize the Canal of Herring and its frequent localization with hybrid hepatocytes. This work establishes a mechanistic framework for understanding IHBD hierarchy and remodeling. By examining IHBD remodeling in health and disease, we identify potential therapeutic targets, including Activin A, for cholangiopathies and liver regeneration.

Table of Contents

- CHAPTER 1 – Introduction………………………………………….…………………………………1

1.1 Functional compartmentalization of the liver…………………………………..………...……2

1.2 Formation and differentiation of liver epithelium…………………………………...…………3

1.3 Tissue remodeling in response to liver injury……………………………………………….…5

1.4 Previous work studying 3D organization of intrahepatic bile ducts……………………...……6

1.5 Scope of the dissertation……………………………………………………………………….7

1.6 Figures………………………………………………………………………….……………..10

Figure 1. Liver functions are compartmentalized………………………….…………….10

Figure 2. Intrahepatic bile duct develop through specification and remodeling…..……..11 

1.7 References…………………………………………...……………………………….……….12

- CHAPTER 2 – Panic at the bile duct: how intrahepatic cholangiocytes respond to stress and injury……………………………………………………………………………...………………………17

2.1 Abstract………..……………………………………………………...………………………18

2.2 Ductular reaction: a common, but heterogeneous response to liver injury………………..…19

2.3 Cholangiopathies………………………………………………………….…………………..22

2.4 Common BEC responses to injury……………………………………………………………26

2.5 Integrating individual features of BEC stress response to understand BEC pathophysiology.39

2.6 Conclusion………………………………………………………...………………………….41

2.7 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………….….………………….43

2.8 Author contributions…………………………………………………………..……………...43

2.9 Funding sources……………………………………………………………..…………..……43

2.10 Figures……………………………………………………………………..….......................44

Figure 1: Ductular reaction can be classified by parenchymal invasiveness…………….44

Figure 2: Common cellular responses in DR and cholangiopathies……………………..45

Figure 3: Biomarkers and pathways associated with biliary epithelial cell responses to stress and injury…………………………………………..……………………………...46

2.11 References……………………………….…………………………………………….…….47

- CHAPTER 3 – Sox9 inhibits Activin A to promote biliary maturation and branching morphogenesis……………………………………………………………………………………………58

3.1 Abstract……………………………………………………..……………………………...…59

3.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………..……..………………...60

3.3 Results………………………………………….……………………………….…………….61

Ductal paucity in adult Sox9cKO mice……………………………………………….…61

Sox9 is required for proper IHBD morphology……………………………………….…63

Sox9cKO BECs exhibit elevated TGF-β signaling and transcriptomic features of immaturity………………………………...……………………………………..……….64

Sox9 has subpopulation-specific impacts on BEC gene expression…………………..…66

Sox9 is required for normal biliary organoid formation and cystic morphology……..….67

Activin A signaling promotes non-cystic mICO phenotype……………………………..68

Late IHBD development proceeds via proliferative expansion of a continuous ductal “web”……………...……………………………………………………………………..70

Loss of Sox9 results in early postnatal ductal paucity…………………………………...71

Activin A inhibition partially rescues branching morphogenesis in Sox9cKO livers……………………………………………………………………………….……..73

3.4 Discussion……………………………...……………………………………………………..74

3.5 Methods……………………………………………………..………………….……………..80

Animal studies………………………………………………………………...…………80

Perfusion and tissue processing………………………………………………………….80

Intrahepatic bile duct dissociation and FACS……………………………………..……..81

Mouse intrahepatic biliary organoid culture……………………………….…………….83

Immunofluorescence on tissue sections………………………………...………………..85

Whole mount organoid staining………………………………………………………….87

Whole tissue staining and iDISCO+ clearing…………………………………………....89

Light sheet imaging………………………………………………………………………91

Whole tissue image processing and data analysis………………………………………..92

Bulk RNA-sequencing…………………………………...…………………………..…..93

Single cell RNA-sequencing………………………………………………...…………...94

RT-qPCR…………………………………………………………………………………97

3.6 Data availability……………………………………………...……………………………….97

3.7 Acknowledgements……………………………………………..…………………………….98

3.8 Author contributions statement…………………………………………………………….…99

3.9 Competing interests statement…………………………………………………………….….99

3.10 Figures……..………………………………………………….……………………………100

Fig. 1: Loss of Sox9 during development results in ductal paucity in adult mice…..….100

Fig. 2: Sox9 promotes biliary identity and limits TGF-β signaling in BECs……….….102

Fig. 3: Sox9 has subpopulation-specific impacts on BEC gene expression………….…104

Fig. 4: Sox9 promotes cystic morphology in BEC-derived organoids………………….106

Fig. 5: Inhibiting Activin A signaling rescues biliary organoid morphology…………..107

Fig. 6: Whole tissue imaging of EpCAM+ IHBD development………………………..109

Fig. 7: Sox9 regulates branching morphogenesis during IHBD development………….111

Fig. 8: Activin A inhibits IHBD branching morphogenesis during postnatal development…………………………………………………………………………….113

Supplementary Fig. 1: Efficient Sox9 recombination in BECs…………………..……..115

Supplementary Fig. 2: Sox9 promotes IHBD cilia formation but is dispensable for apical polarity and proliferation…………………………………………………………….…117

Supplementary Fig. 3: Sox9cKO IHBDs exhibit regional ductal paucity………..…….119

Supplementary Fig. 4: Transcriptomic analysis of BECs in control and Sox9cKO mice…………………………………….……………………………………………….121

Supplementary Fig. 5: Sox9 regulates gene expression in ducts and ductules………....123

Supplementary Fig. 6: Distinct gene expression in ducts and ductules………...………125

Supplementary Fig. 7: Loss of Sox9 does not impact biliary organoid proliferation…..126

Supplementary Fig. 8: Sox9 promotes IHBD branching morphogenesis in postnatal liver development……..……….……………………………………………………………..128

Supplementary Fig. 9: Sox9 is not required for IHBD morphogenesis prior to E17.5…130

Supplementary Fig. 10: Activin A neutralization increases branching near the hilum in Sox9cKO IHBDs………………………...……………………………………………..132

3.11 Table……………………………………...…………………………………………………………133

Supplementary Table 4: Light sheet imaging parameters………………………..….….133

3.12 References………………...………………………………..……………………………………….134

- CHAPTER 4 – Quantitative 3D imaging of intrahepatic bile duct remodeling in response to liver injury……………………………..…………………………………………...........................................139

4.1 Abstract………………………..…………………………………………………………….140

4.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………..……………...141

4.3 Results……………………………………………………..…………………….…………..142

Establishing a robust 3D imaging and analysis pipeline for IHBD architecture……….142

3D image analysis of C57BL/6 IHBDs reveals distinct features of ducts and ductules..143

Applying 3D imaging and analysis to human IHBDs reveals heterogeneous architecture…………………………………………………..………………………….145

3D imaging captures novel phenotypes of IHBD remodeling in response to liver injury………...…………………………………………………….……………………146

Quantitative 3D analysis uncovers key morphological features of noninvasive and invasive IHBD remodeling……...……………………..……………………………….148

Hybrid hepatocytes are primarily localized to the Canal of Hering…………………....150

4.4 Discussion…………………………………………..………….……………………………152

4.5 Methods…………………………………………..…………………….……………………155

Animal studies………………………………………………...………………………..155

Human studies……………………………………………………...…………………...156

Perfusion and tissue processing…………………………………………….……..……157

Immunofluorescence on tissue sections and widefield imaging………………………..158

iDISCO+ immunostaining and clearing……………………………………………..…159

Thick tissue section 3D imaging……………………………..…………………………160

Light sheet imaging………………………….………………………………………….162

Whole tissue image processing and data analysis………………………………..……..162

4.6 Acknowledgements.……….………………………………………………….……………..164

4.7 Author contributions statement……………………………..……………………………….165

4.8 Competing interests statement……………………..………………………………………..165

4.9 Figures…….…………………………………….………………….………………………..166

Figure 1. 3D image analysis defines mouse intrahepatic bile duct architecture…..……166

Figure 2. Human IHBD architecture is heterogeneous within individual tissues and across samples……………………………………………………………………………….…168

Figure 3. 3D imaging reveals novel morphological changes in response to liver injury.170

Figure 4. Quantitative 3D analysis of noninvasive and invasive IHBD remodeling reveals defining features…………………..…………………………………………………….172

Figure 5. 3D Imaging Reveals Hybrid Hepatocyte Relationship to the Canal of Hering…………………………………………………………………………………..174

Figure 6. Canal of Herrings are lost following 6wk DDC……………………...…........176

Supplementary Fig. 1. Validation of imaging and analysis pipeline…………...……….177

Supplementary Fig. 2. Thioacetimide liver injury induces IHBD expansion and branching ……………………………………………………………………………………….….179

Supplementary Fig. 3. VesselVio reveals features of IHBD invasive and noninvasive ductular reactions……………………………………………………………………….181

4.10 Table…………………………………..……………………………………………………182

Supplementary Table 3. Segments that have all 0 values besides radius……………….182

4.11 References………………………………………………………………………………….183

- CHAPTER 5 – Discussion…………………………...………………………………………………..185

5.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….186

5.2 Discussion……………………………………….…………………………………………..186

IHBDs dynamically remodel in response to stress and injury..………………………...186

Regional signaling regulates IHBD remodeling………...……………………………...189

IHBDs remodel during postnatal development………………...……………………….190

5.3 Final Remarks………………………………………...……………………………………..192

5.4 Figure………………………………………………………………………………………..194

Figure 1. 3D imaging is a powerful tool to understand intrahepatic bile duct remodeling…………………...…………………………………………………………194

5.5 References…………………………………………………………………………………...195

-APPENDIX 1 – Cellular and transcriptional heterogeneity of the intrahepatic bile ducts….……198

1.1 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………..…….199

1.2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….200

1.3 Bile duct anatomy……………………………………………….…………………………..201

1.4 Comparative anatomy of model organisms for studying intrahepatic bile ducts…….……...203

1.5 Classical definitions of BEC morphological heterogeneity…………………………...…….205

1.6 Functional heterogeneity in small and large BECs………………………………………….206

1.7 Genetic biomarkers for studying BEC heterogeneity……………………………………….210

1.8 Transcriptomic heterogeneity and emerging single cell technologies in BEC biology…..…212

1.9 Limitations of single cell transcriptomics in BEC biology………………...………………..217

1.10 Lineage relationships and cellular identities of transcriptomically-distinct BEC subpopulations…………………………………………………………………………………..219

1.11 Conclusions and outlook……………………………………………………….…………..221

1.12 Figure………………………………………………………………………………………222

Figure 1. Heterogeneity within small and large intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells…...222

1.13 Tables…………………………………………………………………..…………………..223

Table 1. Comparative liver anatomy across commonly used models of intrahepatic biliary biology……………………….………...……………………………………………….223

Table 2. Defining characteristics between rat small and large intrahepatic bile ducts…224

1.13 Acknowledgements…………...……………………………………………………………225

1.14 Author contributions statement……………………………………………...……………..225

1.15 Competing interests statement…………………………………………..…………………225

1.16 References………………………………………………………………………………….226

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files