Internal vs. External Relations: Role Division Among Educators of Mông Students Restricted; Files Only

Dang, Quynh-Giang (Summer 2024)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/jw827c89b?locale=en
Published

Abstract

In Vietnam, where 41 out of over 93 living languages are classified as endangered, language preservation is a concern for speakers of minority languages. But advocating for a minority language is a delicate task that involves garnering support from the community of speakers while not alienating the majority. This thesis looks at the similarities and differences between two educators who are working on a Mông minority language program in a primary school in Sapa, Vietnam. Given the two educators are very different from each other—the Principal of the majority Viet ethnic group and the Mông language teacher of the Mông group, this thesis examines how their differences have implications for Mông language program.

Through interviewing the educators about their role within Mông programs, I analyzed their language orientation, interview dynamics and alignment with the government to show that they are performing two distinct roles. Additionally, I did Critical Discourse Analysis of policy texts to understand the environment that the educators are working in. This thesis shows that two educators in the same primary school in Sapa, Vietnam are playing different roles—internal and external relations—and contributing to Mông language programs in their unique ways. The Principal does external relations, communicating to government officials and those external to the Mông community, while the Teacher does internal relations, connecting with the Mông community. The study suggests that advocacy for minority groups can benefit from having policymakers of different ideologies and who can connect to different stakeholders. Additionally, more research needs to be done on the individual agency of educators as policy makers instead of grouping them together, because differences among them can have important implications for minority rights advocacy.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction 1

Chapter 2: Literature Review 5

Section 2.1: Sociolinguistic Situation of Vietnam 5

Section 2.2: Minority Language Educational Policies in Vietnam 8

Section 2.3: The Mông Language in Vietnam 11

Section 2.4: Three Orientations Towards Language Planning 13

Section 2.5: Educators as Policymakers 16

Chapter 3: Methodology 19

Section 3.1: Site Description 19

Section 3.2: Participants 20

Section 3.3: Data Collection and Analysis 21

Section 3.4: Critical Discourse Analysis of Policy Texts 22

Chapter 4: Results and Discussions 25

Section 4.1: Top-down Policies 25

Section 4.2: Interview Dynamics 31

Sub-Section 4.2.1: Joint Interview 32

Sub-Section 4.2.2: Individual Interviews 35

Section 4.3: Language Orientations of Educators 43

Sub-Section 4.3.1: Principal Hương 44

Sub-Section 4.3.2: Teacher Dũng 46

Section 4.4: Alignment with the Government 48

Sub-Section 4.4.1: Comparison of Language Orientations 48

Sub-Section 4.4.2: Point of Conflict 50

Chapter 5: Division of Roles 56

Section 5.1: The Teacher as Internal Relations 56

Section 5.2: The Principal as External Relations 59

Chapter 6: Conclusion 63

Bibliography 65

Appendix A: Survey 69

Appendix B: Interview Guidelines (Summer 2022) 70

Appendix C: Interview Guidelines (Summer 2023) 71

Appendix D: Codebook 73

Appendix E: Transcription Conventions 76

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files