Variation in interpretation of Subpart B conditions by stakeholders in the IRB review process of abortion research, United States, 2019 All Restricted

Blackburn, Jessica (Fall 2019)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/gt54kp09r?locale=en
Published

Abstract

This abstract is under embargo until 03 January 2026

Table of Contents

This table of contents is under embargo until 03 January 2026

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement

Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.

School	Rollins School of Public Health
Department	Hubert Department of Global Health
Degree	M.P.H.
Submission	Master's Thesis
Language	English
Research Field	Health Sciences, Public Health Ethics
Keyword	Common Rule Subpart B women's rights vulnerable review board pregnant women 45 CFR 46 ethical review research ethics clinical research compliance human subjects research IRB abortion informed consent induced termination of pregnancy ethics women
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor	Roger Rochat, Emory University
Committee Members	Sarah Cordes, Emory University Lisa Haddad, Emory University

Last modified

Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions
	File download under embargo until 03 January 2026	2019-12-05 13:05:26 -0500	File download under embargo until 03 January 2026

Supplemental Files