Cost-Effectiveness of Indoor Residual Spraying for Malaria Prevention in a Region with High Insecticide-Treated Bed Net Coverage Open Access

Stelmach, Rachel (2015)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/gq67jr30j?locale=en
Published

Abstract

The Tanzania National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) has reduced the burden of malaria in mainland Tanzania, but resource constraints threaten its capacity to maintain and expand its achievements. This thesis presents a decision-tree cost-effectiveness analysis of an indoor residual spraying (IRS) program combined with an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) distribution program, compared to ITN distribution alone. The primary outcome of interest is the expected economic cost to society per case of malaria averted in children in mainland Tanzania under the age of 5. IRS data are drawn from campaigns in northwest Tanzania between 2008 and 2012; all other data are drawn from published literature. Through one-way sensitivity analyses, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses, the effects of variations in insecticide resistance, the malaria parasitemia prevalence rate, and IRS tactics are also examined. In the base case, the combination of ITN distribution and IRS is expected to be more expensive and more effective than the ITN-only intervention (incremental cost per case averted (ICER): $152.36). Important drivers of variability in cost per case averted are the number of IRS rounds required, insecticide costs for IRS, the ITN usage rate, the prevalence of parasitemia, and the probability that an infected child develops symptoms. Compared to blanket spraying, targeted spraying is expected to lead to a higher number of malaria cases per person targeted (between 0.211 and 0.256 versus between 0.050 and 0.076), but the cost per case averted is expected to be lower (ICER: $41.70). In a scenario of increasing pyrethroid resistance, the expected cost per case averted is expected to be higher than in the base case (ICER: $192.12). The NMCP should pursue blanket IRS spraying only in the northern and southern regions, which have the highest prevalence of malaria. If the cost per case averted of blanket spraying exceeds the NMCP's willingness to pay, targeted spraying provides a valid alternative, but it will probably lead to a higher incidence of malaria. A malaria program that employs multiple methods of prevention and control will improve the cost-effectiveness of all its interventions.

Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE 1

1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 2

1.3 PURPOSE STATEMENT 4

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 4

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT 5

1.6 DEFINITION OF TERMS 5

CHAPTER 2: COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 9

2.1 INTRODUCTION 9

2.2 MALARIA IN TANZANIA 9

2.3 TANZANIA MALARIA CONTROL STRATEGIES 11

2.3.1 History of malaria programs in Tanzania. 11

2.3.2 Case detection and management. 14

2.3.3 Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). 17

2.3.4 Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs). 19

2.3.5 Indoor residual spraying (IRS). 21

2.4 IRS 21

2.4.1 Description of IRS. 22

2.4.2 Effectiveness of IRS. 24

2.4.3 Combining IRS and ITNs. 25

2.4.4 Current IRS in Tanzania. 28

2.4.5 Lessons learned from prior IRS campaigns. 29

2.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSES 35

2.5.1 Case management. 36

2.5.2 IPT. 36

2.5.3 ITNs. 37

2.5.4 IRS. 38

2.6 DISCUSSION OF AVAILABLE EVIDENCE 44

CHAPTER 3: PROJECT CONTENTS 46

3.1 METHODOLOGY 46

3.1.1 Introduction. 46

3.1.2 Population and Sample. 46

3.1.3 Research design. 46

3.1.4 Procedures. 47

3.1.5 Instruments. 49

3.1.6 Plans for data analysis. 58

3.1.7 Ethical considerations. 60

3.1.8 Limitations and delimitations. 60

3.2 RESULTS 62

3.2.1 Values. 62

3.2.2 Base case. 65

3.2.3 One-way sensitivity analyses. 67

3.2.4 Probabilistic sensitivity analysis. 73

3.2.5 Scenario: best- and worst-case. 74

3.2.6 Scenario: targeted spraying. 75

3.2.7 Scenario: increased pyrethroid resistance. 76

CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 78

4.1 DISCUSSION 78

4.1.1 Baseline findings. 78

4.1.2 Prevalence of malaria. 79

4.1.3 Insecticide costs and resistance. 80

4.1.4 Targeted spraying. 81

4.1.5 Strengths and weaknesses. 82

4 .1.6 Suggestions for future research. 83

4.2 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 84

APPENDIX I: DECISION TREE 86

APPENDIX II: IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS: DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT 88

APPENDIX III: ADDITIONAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSES 101

REFERENCES 103

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Partnering Agencies
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files