Who really turned off the light?: Defining the licensing of metonymic clipping from an empirical standpoint Public
Davis, Tonia Nicole (2010)
Abstract
Abstract
Who really turned off the light?:
Defining the licensing of metonymic clipping from an empirical
standpoint
By Tonia N. Davis
Metonymy is the process by which one word stands for another, as
exemplified by I ate a box of
cookies (literally cookies - not a box - were eaten). In this
research, we examine the semantic
conditions that license the use of metonymy, and in particular,
test the proposal that certain types of
metonymic reference - those involving metonymic clipping - are
licensed by agency-based vagueness.
Metonymic clipping occurs when a single individual is used to refer
to an entire series of events, as in
William the Conqueror changed the English language. In
Experiment 1, metonymic clipping was rated
more acceptable for sentences with vague verbs (e.g. change)
than without, and for sentences involving
groups of agents rather than single agents. In Experiment 2,
metonymic clipping was rated more
acceptable for sentences in which there was temporal overlap
between the initiator's and the agents'
actions than when there was no overlap. Experiment 3 indicated that
the conditions licensing
metonymic clipping are not simply due to the sheer number of agents
in the causal chain, but rather (by
hypothesis) the vagueness of events in the series. Experiment 4
indicated that metonymic clipping was
less acceptable when the agents of the action were named than when
they were nameless. Implications
of metonymy on our understanding of the interface between language
and cognition are discussed.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Experiments
Experiment
1......................................................................................................10-14
Experiment
2......................................................................................................14-18
Experiment
3......................................................................................................18-22
Experiment
4......................................................................................................22-25
Tables
Table
1.................................................................................................................12
Table
2.................................................................................................................16
Table
3.................................................................................................................20
Table
4.................................................................................................................24
Figures
Figure
1................................................................................................................13
Figure
2................................................................................................................17
Figure
3................................................................................................................21
Figure
4................................................................................................................24
References........................................................................................................32-34
About this Honors Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Mot-clé | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
Who really turned off the light?: Defining the licensing of metonymic clipping from an empirical standpoint () | 2018-08-28 13:26:38 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|