The Possibility of Universal Objective Validity in the Human Sciences: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Wilhelm Dilthey's Hermeneutics Open Access

Hammond, Courtney Elizabeth (2009)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/fb494899s?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Abstract
The Possibility of Universal Objective Validity in the Human Sciences: A
Pragmatic Interpretation of Wilhelm Dilthey's Hermeneutics
By Courtney Hammond Murphy
This dissertation focuses on Wilhelm Dilthey's inquiry into the possibility of securing scientific knowledge of the human world while
preserving the truth of the human spirit. More specifically, he asks whether universal objective validity is possible in the human sciences. I trace the
origins of the question from Leibniz to Kant, in order to highlight some of Dilthey's main advancements, namely finitude and historicity.
Whereas Leibniz fails to recognize space and time as enabling conditions, Kant fails to recognize that time is not merely an enabling condition, but also experienced content. And whereas Kant's project in the first Critique is mostly concerned with the limits of our knowledge in the natural sciences, Dilthey is concerned with the human sciences. Thus, Dilthey, in his critique of historical reason, goes one step further than Kant in insisting that time is a real category and not simply ideal. This, in turn, effects the categories by which we think, since they too must be temporal.
Thus, after "realizing" time and the categories by which we think, Dilthey now asks if universal objective validity is possible. I contend that it is, and
that Dilthey's hermeneutics provides us with the rules for understanding these real categories, and the method for bringing our initial certainty of
immediate lived experience to the level of reliability in articulating that experience. I then appeal to Dewey in order to conclude that universal objective validity in the human sciences is possible when our interpretations contribute to and conserve the meaning of their objects as made manifest in practical activity.

The Possibility of Universal Objective Validity in the Human Sciences: A
Pragmatic Interpretation of Wilhelm Dilthey's Hermeneutics
By
Courtney Hammond Murphy
B.A., Loyola Marymount University, 1995
M.A., University of California, Riverside, 1998
Advisor: Rudolf Makkreel, Ph.D.
A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the
James T. Laney School of Graduate Studies of Emory University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
in Philosophy
2009

Table of Contents

Table of Contents


Introduction: Dilthey and the Problem of Universal Objective Validity
1


Chapter I: From Leibniz to Kant: The Origins of the Crisis of Historicity and its
Solution

15


1. Background: The Kant‐Eberhard Controversy
18

2. Eberhard's Criticisms of Kant's Critique
28

3. Kant's Criticism of Leibniz and His Solution to the Problem of Epistemic
Justification
33

4. Kant's Distinctions
38

5. Kant's Schematism
43


Chapter II: Dilthey's Critique of Kant
57


1. Dilthey's Indebtedness to Kant
59

2. The Principle of Phenomenality and the Justification of Facts of Consciousness
63

3. The Changing Subject and the A Priori Conditions for the Possibility of Experience
70

4. Dilthey's Categories: Real vs. Formal
78

5. Space and Time: Real Conditions of Experience
90


Chapter III: Dilthey's Project: The Critique of Historical Reason
96

1. The Guiding Question of the Critique of Historical Reason
97

2. The Age of Crisis: Historicism vs. Positivism
99

3. The Natural vs. Human Sciences and the Nature of Objectivity
112

4. Dilthey's Hermeneutics and the Possibility of Objectivity
121


5. Verstehen and Objectivity in the Human Sciences
130

6. Verstehen and its Foundations
136


Chapter IV: The possibility of Universal Objective Validity in the Human
Sciences

146


1. De Mul's Solution to the Problem of Universal Objective Validity
149

2. The Possibility of Universal Validity in the Human Sciences
160

3. Objectivity and Universal Validity in the Human Sciences
167


Chapter V: A Pragmatic Approach to Universal Objective Validity
178


1. Dilthey's Pragmatic Leanings
182

2. Dewey's Pragmatism and Universal Objective Validity
190

3. Dewey's Conception of Experience
192

4. The Objects of Experience
197

5. The Experimental Method
200

6. Universal Objective Validity
206


Bibliography
210

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files