The Business of Politics: Assessing the Impact of Corporate Power and Campaign Contributions on Judicial Decision-Making Public

Abstract

The Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission sparked a large debate about the growing influence of corporate spending in politics. While campaign contributions have increased significantly since Citizens United, I question how effective this spending is at influencing judicial decision-making. I predict that as corporations become more powerful politically they will naturally cause justices to rule favorably towards business group interests, making campaign contributions unnecessary. In this thesis, I explore the effects of corporate political power and campaign spending on judicial decision-making in State Supreme Courts. I introduce a new method by which to measure corporate political power, using the Bureau of Economic Analysis' Industry Specialization Index as a proxy for corporate political strength. After conducting a comparative analysis of cases from before and after Citizens United, my results demonstrate that, in the aggregate, justices are unresponsive to levels of corporate power and campaign spending, and that the Citizens United decision has not made justices more likely to favor business group interests.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

I. Introduction..............................................................................1

II. Literature Review......................................................................1

i. Measuring Corporate Political Power.......................................6

ii. A Brief History of Judicial Elections........................................9

iii. Judicial Selection Methods.................................................10

iv. Campaign Contributions in Judicial Elections..........................13

III. Theory..................................................................................16

IV. Hypothesis.............................................................................18

V. Data......................................................................................18

VI. Analysis.................................................................................25

i. Variable Summary Statistics.................................................26

ii. Hypothesis Testing............................................................31

iii. Post-Citizens United Analysis..............................................35

VIII. Discussion............................................................................40

IX. Potential for Future Research.....................................................43

X. Conclusion...............................................................................44

XI. References.............................................................................45

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement

• Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.

School	Emory College
Department	Political Science
Degree	BA
Submission	Honors Thesis
Language	English
Research Field	Political Science, General
Mot-clé	Campaign Spending Corporate Political Power Citizens United Judicial Decision-Making
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor	Clark, Tom, Emory University
Committee Members	Giles, Micheal W, Emory University Eisen, Arri, Emory University

Dernière modification

Primary PDF

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions
	The Business of Politics: Assessing the Impact of Corporate Power and Campaign Contributions on Judicial Decision-Making ()	2018-08-28 14:44:51 -0400	Press to Select an action Download

Supplemental Files

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions