American Receptions of Thucydides in the Antebellum Slavery Debate Público

Abstract

The study of Roman and Greek antiquity, including the languages of Latin and ancient Greek, were heavily emphasized in American classrooms. Naturally, this pervasive study in the classics permeated other areas of discourse in society. The early nineteenth century brought about an increased admiration for Hellenic culture, coinciding with the height of the American abolitionist debate. Therefore, abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates in the antebellum period (roughly 1816-1861) often invoked ancient Greek authors to support their own beliefs and arguments. Appropriations of Aristotle are known for being used by advocates of slavery; however, receptions of the ancient Greek historian Thucydides (c. 460- c. 400 BCE) and his work are less studied in this context. This thesis specifically focuses on how antebellum authors referenced Thucydides, to both justify and attack the modern institution of slavery.

Through the analysis of antebellum speeches, newspaper articles, and books regarding slavery, this thesis aims to examine not only the ways in which authors referred to Thucydides in the context of the slavery debate, but also how they referred to specific passages from his Peloponnesian War and then adapted and manipulated his writing for their own agendas. My first chapter juxtaposes how abolitionists and anti-abolitionists referenced Thucydides because of the rising appreciation for Greek culture. Both sides viewed Thucydides as a representative of Greek cultural achievement, yet abolitionists deployed a passage regarding piracy from the Peloponnesian War to demonstrate that not all ancient customs should be deemed moral. My second chapter focuses on antebellum references to Thucydides’ account of Spartan helotage, a particular form of ancient slavery. These references all came from abolitionists, who lamented at the barbaric nature of helotage and attributed to it the downfall of Greece. My final chapter analyzes how Thucydides was used in the philological component of theological arguments regarding whether the Greek terms δοῦλος and δουλεία were truly meant to denote ‘slave’ and ‘slavery’ in the Bible. By means of in-depth analysis of primary sources, this study demonstrates the role of Thucydidean receptions in arguments of American abolitionists and proslavery advocates in the decades before the Civil War. 

Table of Contents

Introduction 1

Chapter I: Hellenism and Receptions of Thucydides in the Antebellum Slavery Debate 4

Chapter II: Critique of Slavery through References to Helotage 29

Chapter III: Thucydides Receptions in Support of Biblical Arguments 48

Conclusion 74

Bibliography 77 

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement

• Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.

School	Emory College
Department	Classics
Degree	B.A.
Submission	Honors Thesis
Language	English
Research Field	Classical Studies History, United States
Palabra Clave	Classical Receptions Reception Peloponnesian War Sparta Bible Piracy Homer Plutarch Biblical Thucydides Abolitionist Helot Helotage Slave Hellenism Abolition Slavery
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor	Barbara Lawatsch-Melton, Emory University
Committee Members	Cynthia Patterson, Emory University Louise Pratt, Emory University

Última modificación

Primary PDF

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions
	American Receptions of Thucydides in the Antebellum Slavery Debate ()	2022-04-12 14:57:10 -0400	Press to Select an action Download

Supplemental Files

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Actions