Poetic Visions: Figures of Sight and Feminine Subjectivity in the Works of Sylvia Plath, Anne Carson, and Mei-mei Berssenbrugge 公开

Dunne, Colleen Catherine (2011)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/8336h2599?locale=zh
Published

Abstract

Although Sylvia Plath stands as an iconic figure for the emergence of the feminine lyric voice in 20th century American poetry, the popular interpretation of this voice as a "confessional" one has misrepresented the significance of her work by framing it largely within the confines of biographical studies. This focus has camouflaged an important aspect of Plath's poetry, namely, how it stages the crisis attendant to the figuration of the feminine lyric voice. Plath's work operates within what I've identified as a culturally dominant "script for seeing," a detached gaze that assumes a masculine "I/eye" and a feminine object. As a result, the feminine "subject," that appears in Plath's work is one which can't claim a lyric voice - it is muted and artificial, a victim of the objectification of the script her poems stage. Plath's work does not merely re-enact this script; it also comments upon it, exposing its violence and cruelty through hyperbolic theatricality. Plath's dramatic staging of this crisis which haunts the birth of feminine lyric subjectivity shapes and invites new and vital forms of poetic dialogue, examples of which can be found in the works of two contemporary women poets, Mei-Mei Berssenbrugge and Anne Carson. Albeit in different ways, both poets open up new possibilities for conceptualizing feminine subjectivity by revising the kind of "script for sight" that dominates Plath's lyric voice. Anne Carson's subject resists the de-humanization of Plath's theatrical self-presentation by moving "offstage" into the margins where meaning cannot be seen but must be read. Although Mei-Mei Berssenbrugge's work, like Carson's, seeks to disempower visual objectification, it does this not by undermining the link between language and perception, but rather by expanding and complicating that connection. Her work carves a space for feminine subjectivity without separating itself from the realm of representation, locating latent possibility and "interiority" within outward forms. In their poetic engagement with notions of vision and subjectivity, both Anne Carson and Mei-mei Berssenbrugge elude the traps of feminine representation embodied in Plath's work and open up new possibilities for figuring the feminine lyric voice.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents

Chapter 1 - Introduction………………………………………………………………………….........................1
1.1 Scripts for Femininity and Scripts for Seeing……………………………………………………..........1
1.2 Poetry, Vision, and the Feminine Subject……………………………………………………….............2
1.3 Psychoanalytic Theory: Specularity and Sexual Difference……………………………............6
1.4 Figuring Sight and Feminine Subjectivity: Sylvia Plath, Anne Carson, and Mei-Mei
Brussenbrugge…………………………………………………………………………………..............................10

Chapter 2 - Staging Scripting: Sylvia Plath's Theater of the Self……………………………........13
2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………........................13
2.2 The Script for Seeing…………………………………………………………………………….....................23
2.3 Identifying the Script………………………………………………………………………….......................31
2.4 Ensuring an Audience: The Lure of Autobiography in Plath's Poetry…………………….....56
2.5 The Illusory Body: Staging the Script…………………………………………………………..............71

Chapter 3 - Seeing as "Reading" in Anne Carson's Poetry……………………………………...........81
3.1 Images and the Imagination……………………………………………………………………..................81
3.2 Autobiography as Reading/ Revision……………………………….............…………..……….......101
3.3 Arbitrary Markings……………………………………………………………………………........................123
3.4 Gender and Genre…………………………………………………………………………..........................140

Chapter 4 - "Becoming of the Eye Between Light and Heart:" - Feminine Subjectivity

in Mei-Mei Berssenbrugge's Poetry…………………………………………….....................……….......154
4.1 The Language of Science………………………………………………………………..................…......154
4.2 The Fragmented Feminine………………………………………………………………………..................161
4.3 Hidden Continuities…………………………………………………………………………….......................167
4.4 Feminine Phenomenologies………………………………………………………………........................179
4.5 Bodies of Becoming and Between…………………………………………………………....................184
Conclusion: ……………………………………………………………………………………................................190

Bibliography: …………………………………………………………………………………………….......................194

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
关键词
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
最新修改

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files