Adoption of Health Information Technology Systems among U.S. Hospitals 2007-2012 Pubblico

Wrocklage, James (2015)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/6t053g220?locale=it
Published

Abstract

Health information technology (HIT) systems are diverse and play varied roles in improving healthcare delivery. Despite the current push for the advancement of HIT infrastructure in the U.S., adoption rates of HIT systems have been slower than expected. In addition, most studies that examine adoption rates focus on specific systems or use non-weighted aggregation. This study investigated the diffusion of HIT systems by employing a novel, weighted scale aggregating 18 different clinical IT systems. We employed proportional hazard modelling to estimate the time to adoption for basic, medium and advanced levels of HIT infrastructure, and control for hospital organizational factors. Our results indicate that small hospitals (<100 beds) are falling the furthest behind in HIT adoption, and may be failing to implement even rudimentary HIT technologies. Also, rural and for-profit hospitals, as well as hospitals with poor network involvement are lagging behind national averages. As the U.S. moves toward a nationwide network of intercommunicating health technologies, these hospitals may become stumbling blocks in the provision of safe, timely, and effective care. Policy should be targeted to lagging hospitals in order to meet HIT adoption goals and prevent the technological gap from widening.

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION. 1

LITERATURE REVIEW. 2

Health information technology systems. 2

Adoption trends before the HITECH Act. 3

HITECH Act. 3

Adoption trends after the HITECH Act. 4

The Digital Divide - differences between early and late adopters. 5

Measures of HIT adoption. 6

Gaps in literature. 7

METHODS. 7

Conceptual Framework - Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Dissemination Science. 7

Dataset and Analytic Sample. 12

Research Questions and Hypothesis. 12

Dependent Variable. 12

Independent Variables. 14

Research Design. 15

RESULTS. 16

Cohort descriptives. 16

CITA scores. 17

Proportional hazard models. 20

DISCUSSION. 23

Summary. 23

Limitations. 25

Policy Implications. 26

Future Research. 28

CONCLUSION. 29

REFERENCES. 30

APPENDICES. 37

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Parola chiave
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Partnering Agencies
Ultima modifica

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files