Development and evaluation of a 3D imaging system for child anthropometry 公开
Conkle, Joel (Fall 2017)
Abstract
The usefulness of anthropometry is undermined by poor measurement quality, which has led to calls from the global nutrition community for new technology to improve the quality of child anthropometry. In response, a full-body 3D imaging system, AutoAnthro, was designed to measure child stature, arm circumference (MUAC) and head circumference (HC). The research that makes up this dissertation came from the Body Imaging for Nutritional Assessment Study (BINA), which was a large-scale validation study of AutoAnthro.
BINA collected manual and 3D scan-derived measurements from 474 children under five years of age in Atlanta, USA. We first analyzed manual measurement quality to confirm that we collected gold standard anthropometry. We then evaluated the reliability and accuracy of 3D scan-derived measurements against manual measurements, and included an assessment of how similar the two methods were in classifying nutritional status. Finally, we evaluated the efficiency, invasiveness, and user experience of 3D imaging by conducting a time-motion study on a subsample of BINA participants, and by interviewing BINA anthropometrists. To place our research into context we carried out literature reviews on anthropometric data quality and the use of 3D imaging for anthropometry.
After finding excellent quality of manual measurements we concluded that BINA could provide a meaningful evaluation of 3D imaging for child anthropometry. In comparing the two methods we found that measurement reliability of repeated scans was excellent, and similar to manual measurement reliability for stature, HC and MUAC. We found systematic bias when analyzing accuracy — 3D imaging overestimated stature and HC and underestimated MUAC. After adjusting scan-derived measurements to remove systematic bias, 3D imaging and manual measurement yielded similar mean z-scores, z-score standard deviations (SD), and prevalence. Sensitivity and specificity of adjusted, scan-derived measurements was good to excellent for all measures. Qualitative data showed anthropometrists considered the use of AutoAnthro an easy, ‘streamlined experience’ when measuring cooperative children, but scanning uncooperative children was difficult. We found that scanning took less time and was less stressful for children than manual measurement.
Technology could be the most efficient driver of anthropometric data quality improvement. We do not yet know if AutoAnthro will lead to improved quality of child measurements, but BINA showed that a 3D imaging system produced reliable measurements of children under five years of age, which suggests that 3D imaging can be an appropriate anthropometric tool for infants and young children. Further research and development is needed, particularly to determine if AutoAnthro improves quality and to address our findings of systematic inaccuracy and anthropometrists’ lack of confidence in scanning uncooperative children. The potential value of 3D imaging for anthropometry is not limited to quality improvement; adoption of the technology could result in collection of hundreds of measurements during regular nutritional assessment, and lead to the discovery of new indicators that make anthropometry a better predictor of outcomes of interest.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements vi
List of Figures x
List of Tables xi
Research in Technology Context xii
Chapter 1 . Introduction 1
1.1 Calls for Improved Anthropometric Data Quality 2
Chapter 2 . Background 7
2.1. 3D Imaging for Anthropometry – The Past (1800s and 1900s) 7
2.2. 3D Imaging for Anthropometry – 2000-Present 9
Chapter 3 . Improving the Quality of Child Anthropometry: Manual Anthropometry in the 3D Body Imaging for Nutritional Assessment Study (BINA) 20
3.1. Introduction 22
3.2. Materials and Methods 23
3.3. Results from Quality Tests 30
3.4. Discussion 32
3.5. Conclusions 37
3.6. Figures and Tables 39
References (Chapter 3) 42
Chapter 4 . Accuracy and Reliability of a Low-Cost, Handheld 3D Imaging System for Child Anthropometry 46
4.1. Introduction 48
4.2. Materials and Methods 49
4.3. Results 54
4.4. Discussion 59
4.4. Figures and Tables 63
Chapter 5 . Supplementary Materials for Accuracy and Reliability of a Low-Cost, Handheld 3D Imaging System for Child Anthropometry 70
5.1. Supplementary Methods 70
5.2 Supplementary Discussion 74
5.3 Supplementary Figures and Tables 82
Chapter 6 . A collaborative, mixed-methods evaluation of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry 94
6.1. Introduction 96
6.2. Materials and Methods 97
6.3 Results 102
6.4 Discussion 107
6.5 Conclusions 114
6.6 Figures and Tables 115
References (Chapter 6) 122
Chapter 7 . Discussion 126
7.1. Summary of Findings 126
7.2. AutoAnthro anthropometry quality in relation to other 3D imaging systems 127
7.3. Study Strengths and Limitations 130
7.4. AutoAnthro Research and Development Needs 132
7.5. 3D Imaging for Anthropometry – The Future 144
7.6. Conclusions 155
7.7 Supplementary Tables and Figures 156
References (Chapter 7) 158
About this Dissertation
| School | |
|---|---|
| Department | |
| Degree | |
| Submission | |
| Language |
|
| Research Field | |
| 关键词 | |
| Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
| Committee Members |
Primary PDF
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Development and evaluation of a 3D imaging system for child anthropometry () | 2017-10-31 10:44:01 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
|---|