Local Coordinated Market Outcomes in a National Liberal Market Economy: the Greenville Model Restricted; Files Only

Schneider, Crawford (Spring 2018)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/2f75r803n?locale=en
Published

Abstract

In 2013, nearly 80% of the 25,000 students that graduated from Greenville Technical College were employed or continuing their education. The majority of those graduates obtained skills specifically directed at immediate entrance into the workforce. The county, previously known as the textile capitol of the world, has been able attract significant foreign direct investment in advanced manufacturing by promoting its highly skilled workforce. Greenville’s institutional ecology, led by Greenville Technical College and the Greenville Workforce Development Board, provides industry-wide portable skills to under and unemployed workers in Greenville County, uncommon in a liberal market economies like the United States. As such, Greenville represents both a practical and empirical puzzle. It is not only a hybrid between classic liberal market economies and coordinated market economies within the varieties of capitalism literature but it also provides policy makers with an example of interconnected institutions effective in industry-wide skills provision.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents                 

 

Section I: Introduction - 1

 

Section II: Theory and Methods - 6

 

            A: Origins of Varieties of Capitalism - 6

 

            B: Assumptions Made by Varieties of Capitalism - 7

 

            C: Pure Form Varieties of Capitalism - 8

 

            D: Complementary Institutions - 9

 

            E: Hybrid Case - 12

 

            F: CME vs LME Skill Outcomes - 14

 

            G: Methods - 18

 

Section III: Greenville Skill Outcomes - 20

 

            A: Industry-Wide Skill Provision - 20

           

            B: K-12 Public Education - 22

 

            C: Firm Specific Training - 24

 

            D: Apprenticeships - 25

 

Section IV: Classifying Greenville - 29

 

Section V: The Greenville Institutional Ecology - 33

 

            A: Investment Promotion Cluster - 35

 

            B: Workforce Development Cluster - 40

 

            C: Political Oversight Cluster - 47

 

Section VI: Institutional Equivalence and Complementarity - 51

 

            A: County Coherence - 51

 

            B: Advisory Boards - 53

 

            C: Investment Promotion - 55

 

            D: Localized Political Oversight - 58

 

            E: Greenville Works - 59

 

            F: Foreign Firm Leadership - 61

 

Section VII: Origins of the Greenville System - 62

 

Section VIII: Conclusions - 64

 

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified No preview

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files