An integrative approach to investigate treatment-resistant lung adenocarcinoma 公开
Rackley, Briana (Spring 2020)
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, killing 135,720 people per year. Co-mutation of the oncogene KRAS and the tumor suppressor LKB1 has been shown to increase disease severity, promote metastasis, and decrease survival. The impact of these co-mutations on patient outcomes has been well studied, but how these two mutations work together to promote tumorigenesis is unknown. The work in this dissertation uses in vivo models and patient data to demonstrate that synergy between KRAS and LKB1 is driven by autonomous growth, proliferation, and co-activation of downstream targets. Additionally, tumorigenesis is dependent upon high levels of oncogenic KRAS. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we determined that knockdown of Lkb1 works with RasV12 to override organ size control. This increase in organ size was driven by autonomous proliferation and offset by autonomous cell death. Additionally, RasV12 and Lkb1 knockdown work together to promote filamentous actin disorganization and basement membrane degradation. To further elucidate the mechanisms by which oncogenic KRAS and loss of LKB1 promote tumor progression and impede treatment response, we sought to understand how levels of oncogenic Ras contribute to Lkb1-null tumor progression and uncover novel signaling pathway components that may be targetable therapeutically. Comparison of high RasV12 expression (RasHi) to low/moderate RasV12 expression (RasLo) shows that RasHi is required for complete neoplastic transformation of Lkb1-null tissues. The effects of RasHi extend beyond tumor initiation, as RasHi levels drive tumor progression and metastasis via breakdown of basement membrane and collagen structures resulting in dissemination into secondary sites. We show that phenotypes observed using Drosophila are also observed in human patients, as co-mutation of high levels of KRAS and loss of LKB1 were shown to decrease overall patient survival compared to low level KRAS expression. Finally, we determined that tumor severity is likely driven by unprecedented co-activation of AMPK and mTOR signaling, promoting cell autophagic mechanisms and unrestricted growth. Indirect inhibition of AMPK via the CaMKII inhibitor KN-93 was shown to partially rescue observed phenotypes, offering potential avenues for continued exploration. Follow-up studies in this area will help in providing opportunities for better treatment of this subset of patients.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction Pages 1-38
1.1 Lung cancer
1.1.1 Lung cancer overview 2-3
1.1.2 Lung cancer subtypes 4
1.1.3 Common lung cancer mutations 5-6
1.1.4 Current treatments 7-10
1.1.5 Racial and ethnic disparities 10-12
1.2 KRAS background
1.2.1 RAS superfamily 13
1.2.2 KRAS in cancer 14-15
1.2.3 KRAS prognosis and treatment in lung cancer 16-17
1.2.4 mTOR activation in KRAS-mutant lung cancer 17-18
1.3 LKB1 background
1.3.1 LKB1 in disease development 18-20
1.3.2 LKB1 as a master regulator 21-22
1.3.3 Regulation and function of AMPK 23
1.3.4 KRAS and LKB1 in lung cancer 24-26
1.4 Cancer cell metastasis
1.4.1 Metastasis overview 27-28
1.4.2 Metastatic heterogeneity 29-30
1.4.3 Metastasis in lung cancer 30-31
1.5 Drosophila melanogaster
1.5.1 Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism 31-32
1.5.2 Drosophila melanogaster biology 32
1.5.3 Drosophila melanogaster genetics 32-35
1.5.4 Understanding organ size control using Drosophila 36-37
1.5.5 Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human cancer 37
1.6 Rationale and scope of dissertation 37-38
Chapter 2. Oncogenic Ras cooperates with knockdown of the tumor suppressor 39-64
Lkb1 by RNAi to override organ size limits in Drosophila wing tissue
2.1 Introduction 41-43
2.2 Methods 44-47
2.3 Results 48-58
2.4 Discussion 59-61
Chapter 3. The levels of oncogenic Ras control clonal growth dynamics to 65-106
transform Lkb1-mutant tissue in vivo
3.1 Introduction 67-69
3.2 Methods 70-79
3.3 Results 80-99
3.4 Discussion 100-102
Chapter 4. Summary and Future Directions 107-124
4.1 Discussion of dissertation 108-109
4.2 Oncogenic RasV12 drives Lkb1-mutant tissue overgrowth 109-112
4.3 High levels of oncogenic RasV12 are required for neoplastic 112-117
transformation and metastatic spread
References 118-131
List of Figures
Figure 1.1. Leading sites of estimated new cancer deaths – 2020. Page 3
Figure 1.2. Oncogenic driver mutations in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. Page 6
Figure 1.3. Racial disparities in cancer survival rates. Page 12
Figure 1.4. KRAS mutations by cancer type. Page 15
Figure 1.5. LKB1 mutations by cancer type. Page 20
Figure 1.6. LKB1 functions in biological processes. Page 22
Figure 1.7. Co-mutation of KRAS and LKB1 drives decreased progression-free Page 26
survival.
Figure 1.8. Overview of metastatic progression. Page 28
Figure 1.9. Understanding Drosophila biology and genetics. Page 35
Figure 2.1. RasV12/Lkb1RNAi mutations override 3rd instar wing imaginal disc Page 50
size control.
Figure 2.2. Co-mutant RasV12/Lkb1RNAi overrides 3rd instar eye imaginal disc Page 52
size control.
Figure 2.3. Expression of co-mutant RasV12/Lkb1RNAi drives autonomous cell Page 55
proliferation and autonomous cell death.
Figure 2.4. RasV12 promotes basement membrane degradation of Lkb1-mutant Page 58
tissue.
Figure S2.1. Co-mutation of RasV12 with loss of Lkb1 function causes adult Page 62
wing overgrowth.
Figure S2.2. RasV12/Lkb1RNAi rescue 3rd instar wing imaginal disc cell size. Page 63
Figure S2.3. Co-mutant RasV12/Lkb1RNAi drives F-actin filament Page 64
disorganization.
Figure 3.1. Clonal loss of Lkb1 in vivo results in autonomous cell death. Page 82
Figure 3.2. Oncogenic RasHi promotes the malignant transformation of Lkb1 Page 85
mutant tissue.
Figure 3.3. SiMView light sheet microscopy allows visualization of local and Page 89
distant collagen IV degradation by tumor cells over time.
Figure 3.4. RasHi/Lkb1-/- mutant cells exhibit single and multi-cell dynamics Page 91
during cell migration in vivo.
Figure 3.5. Oncogenic RasHi promotes co-activation of AMPK and mTOR in Page 94
Lkb1-mutant malignant tumors in vivo.
Figure 3.6. High level oncogenic KRAS drives decreased patient survival and Page 98
is associated with AMPK activation in LKB1 mutant patients.
Figure S3.1. Blocking cell death with P35 in Lkb1 mutant clones does not Page 103
phenocopy RasLo/ Lkb1-/-.
Figure S3.2. High level oncogenic Ras promotes proliferation and S-phase Page 104
progression of Lkb1-mutant tissue.
Figure S3.3. Acidic vesicle accumulation in RasHi/Lkb1-/- tissue. Page 105
Figure S3.4. High level KRAS does not result in survival differences in TP53 Page 106
mutant lung cancer patients.
About this Dissertation
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Subfield / Discipline | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
关键词 | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
An integrative approach to investigate treatment-resistant lung adenocarcinoma () | 2020-04-07 10:17:00 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|