Poetry, Politics, and Pedagogy: Defining and Developing Critical Literacies in Intermediate-Level College French Público
Keneman, Margaret Lynn (2013)
Abstract
To begin with, this study expands on existing notions of foreign language literacy and critical literacies (Freire, 1993; Hasan, 1996; New London Group, 1996; Swaffar and Arens, 2005) by positing student voice and "production of knowledge" (Hasan, 1996) as central to the development of critical literacies in a foreign language. Using this definition, the primary investigator worked with several university-level French instructors to design two modules to represent the tenets of a critical literacies pedagogy. These modules were then integrated into a standard French 201 curriculum, a curriculum that, according to the syllabus, focuses on skill building and the acquisition of cultural literacy. With each module, students were asked to analyze and (re)produce the following textual genres: (1) slam poetry, and (2) political appeal. This study explored how this critical literacies pedagogical approach influenced student learning in a French 201 course for approximately one semester. A second French 201 course acted as the control group in which no formal critical literacies pedagogy took place.
This study used a mixed methods research design in order to investigate the research questions. Important quantitative findings provided evidence that a critical literacies pedagogical approach did not deter students from learning the traditionally taught grammar points in French 201. Furthermore, qualitative findings indicated that most students valued the opportunity to practice linguistic features (i.e., grammar points) by producing work that was of personal and/or political importance to them. While students were not always aware of their own linguistic progress and critical literacies development, their final slam poems and political appeals revealed their efforts to convey their sense of self as well as their "cross-cultural awareness" (Kramsch & Nolden, 1994) in a way that was often linguistically appropriate and stylistically sophisticated. Student development of critical literacies in a foreign language is ongoing and extends well beyond one semester of instructed learning, but this study illustrates the potential learning outcomes should such a pedagogy be implemented. Practical implications, assessment issues, and suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………….1
Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………………...10
Purpose of the Study……………………………………………………………………..10
Research Questions………………………………………………………………………11
Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………………..11
Significance of the Study………………………………………………………………...17
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE……………………………………………20
Literacy, Multiple Literacies, and Critical Literacies Research…………………………21
Literacy and Foreign Language Education………………………………………………30
Bridging the Gap: Literature and Literacy-Oriented Approaches in the FL Classroom…41
Literature in Lower-Level Language Courses…………………………………...42
Literacy-Oriented Approaches and Their Effectiveness…………………………47
Voice, Empowerment, and Critical Literacies in the FL Classroom…………………….52
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………...59
Mixed Methods Research Design………………………………………………………..59
Rationale…………………………………………………………………………60Implementation and Priority……………………………………………………..60
Participants and Setting…………………………………………………………………..61
Consent Procedures and Confidentiality…………………………………………………63
Classroom Procedures……………………………………………………………………64
Data Sources and Instruments……………………………………………………………73
Background Questionnaire……………………………………………………….74
Interviews………………………………………………………………………...74Literacy-Based Pretest and Posttest……………………………………………...74
Observations……………………………………………………………………..76 Documents……………………………………………………………………….76Traditional Foreign Language Assessments……………………………………..77
Quantitative Analysis Phase……………………………………………………………..77
Qualitative Analysis Phase………………………………………………………………70
Case Studies……………………………………………………………………...81
Researcher Positionality…………………………………………………………82
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS………………………………………………………………85Quantitative Data Interpretation…………………………………………………………85
Preliminary Analyses: Pretest Differences………………………………………85
Preliminary Analyses: Instruments………………………………………………86 Analysis of Research Questions………………………………………………….87 Question 1………………………………………………………………..87 Question 2………………………………………………………………..88 Question 3………………………………………………………………..89 Qualitative Data Interpretation…………………………………………………………..91Analysis of Research Questions…………………………………………………92
Question 3 (Part I)……………………………………………………….92
Question 3 (Part II)……………………………………………………..102
Question 4………………………………………………………………113
Taking a Closer Look: Three Case Studies……………………………………..121
Kristi: Confronting the Possibilities in the Classroom…………………122
Morgan: Self Expression for the True Intermediate……………………128
Ralph: Taking Literal and Metaphorical Risks…………………………135
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION………………………………….141
Limitations……………………………………………………………………………...143Future Research: Towards a Critical Literacies Curriculum in the FL Classroom……..144
Broader Implications for Foreign Language Education………………………………...146
Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………..150 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………152 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………….163Appendix A: Background Questionnaire……………………………………………….163
Appendix B: Informed Consent Form………………………………………………….166
Appendix C: Control Group Composition Prompts……………………………………169
Appendix D: Control Group Presentation Project Guidelines…………………………172
Appendix E: Stage 1: Preparing the text……………………………………………….176
Appendix F: Stage 2: Working into the text, Part I…………………………………….181
Appendix G: Stage 2: Working into the text, Part II…………………………………...185
Appendix H: Stage 3: Reading the text aloud………………………………………….189
Appendix I: Stage 4: Analyzing the text, Part I………………………………………..193
Appendix J: Stage 4: Analyzing the text, Part II……………………………………….197
Appendix K: Stage 5: Composing texts………………………………………………...201
Appendix L: Stage 6: Introducing and analyzing students' texts………………………205
Appendix M: Stage 7: Publishing students' texts………………………………………209
Appendix N: Evaluation forms…………………………………………………………210
Appendix O: Interview Guides…………………………………………………………213
Appendix P: Literacy Pre/Posttest……………………………………………………...215
Appendix Q: Literacy Pre/Posttest Grading Rubric…………………………………….221
TABLES………………………………………………………………………………..225Table 1: Sample Student Characteristics by Course Section…………………………...225
Table 2: Background Information for Participants Enrolled in Critical Literacies
Course…………………………………………………………………………..226
Table 3: Daily Schedule for Modules…………………………………………………..227
Table 4: Pretest Means and Standard Deviations By Course Section………………….228
Table 5: Independent Samples t-test Results for Biweekly FL Assessments…………..229
Table 6: Pretest and Posttest Means and Standard Deviations………………………....230
Table 7: Two-Way ANOVA Results for Literacy Development………………………231
FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………….232Figure 1: Qualitative Data Analysis…………………………………………………….232
Figure 2: Plot of Pretest to Posttest Mean Scores………………………………………233
Figure 3: Plot of Pretest to Posttest Questionnaire Item 4 Mean Scores……………….234
Figure 4: Plot of Pretest to Posttest Questionnaire Item 7 Mean Scores……………….235
Figure 5: Plot of Pretest to Posttest Questionnaire Item 8 Mean Scores……………….236
About this Dissertation
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Palabra Clave | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
Poetry, Politics, and Pedagogy: Defining and Developing Critical Literacies in Intermediate-Level College French () | 2018-08-28 11:54:11 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|