Trilobites Burrowing, Walking, and Feeding in Tidal Flat Facies of the Sequatchie Formation (Late Ordovician), Georgia, USA Restricted; Files Only

Tamez, Amelia (Spring 2024)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/05741t00r?locale=zh
Published

Abstract

The Sequatchie Formation (Late Ordovician) in the southern Appalachians is composed of clastic marginal-marine to shallow-marine facies with trace fossils in most beds. The formation is exposed in a roadcut near Ringgold, Georgia, where its lowermost part, the Ringgold Member, consists of interbedded hematitic sandstones and mudstones. Previous researchers who studied abundant burrows in the Ringgold Member attributed most to small-bodied trilobites. In this study, I reexamined these trace fossils with new digital tools to test this hypothesis and clarify how these trace fossils related to their tidal-flat environments. Descriptions and measurements were taken from dislodged boulders of Ringgold Member sandstones at its type section. Digital photos of bedding planes were processed with Reality Capture™ 1.3 photogrammetry software to render digital 3D models of each specimen. ImageJ™ software was then applied to bedding planes to measure and otherwise quantify burrow abundances and burrow cross-sections, while also analyzing the burrows’ proximity to mudcracks. Most trace fossils are Taenidium, with a few associated Rusophycus and Diplichnites, accompanied by mudcracks, wrinkle marks, low-amplitude ripples, and small vertical burrows (Arenicolites). Specimens of Taenidium are meniscate (backfilled) burrows with horizontal and vertical components, commonly intersecting bedding planes with circular to elliptical cross-sections. Backfills include clay clasts, indicating that burrowers dug through fine-grained laminae without digesting them. Meniscate burrow cross-section areas vary, with a mean of 2.2 + 2.0 cm2 (n = 318), but burrow-area distributions suggest multiple growth stages of one trilobite species, with juveniles more abundant than adults. K-means analyses found burrows were close to or frequently cut across mudcracks, indicating that trilobites likely dug into mudcracks for ecologically significant reasons. Thus, I interpret Taenidium as burrows made by small, short-bodied trilobites burrowing for food on and in tidal-flat sediments. Rusophycus and Diplichnites show directions of movement toward or away from burrows, with fine details likely preserved by microbial mats. Hematitic sandstones and mudstones in the Ringgold Member further indicate these tidal flats were well-oxygenated environments. Although trilobites are normally regarded as full-marine fauna, their presence in tidal-flat facies shows adaptations to marginal-marine conditions, where they were actively burrowing and feeding.

Table of Contents

Introduction                                                                                                                            1

1.1  Geological Setting                                                                                                3

1.2  Paleontological Context                                                                                       4

Material and Methods                                                                                                             5

2.1 Sample Locality                                                                                                    5

Figure 1. General geography of Georgia, USA. The location of study is 

in Ringgold, Georgia, denoted by the star label.                                            6

Figure 2. Geography of US Interstate Highway 75, Exit 348 located in 

Ringgold, Georgia, USA. The map includes terrain features (light grey 

rectangles = surrounding buildings, dark grey/black = roads/interstates). 

The location of study is magnified to illustrate each in-situ slab’s

 (Slabs 1-3) location within the site. Slab 1: 34°54’25” N, 85°6’25” W. 

Slab 2: 34°54’25” N, 85°6’26” W. Slab 3: 34°54’26” N, 85°6’26” W.        7

2.2 Sample and Data Collection                                                                                 8

Results                                                                                                                                    11

3.1 Trace Fossil Description                                                                                       11

Figure 3. Slab 1 of the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation. A, 3D 

photogrammetry model of in-situ slab 1 created using Reality Capture™ 

1.3, white squares outline study areas 1A and 1B. B, Illustration of traces 

on Specimen 1A. C, Illustration of traces on Specimen 1B. B and C 

illustrate sedimentary structures and trace fossils (medium grey, unlined 

= mudcrack; dark grey, outlined elliptical/circular = Taenidium and 

Rusophycus; black, circular = Arenicolites U-shaped burrows; patterned, 

unlined = Diplichnites) created using Adobe Illustrator used in 

calculations and k-means analysis. Scale = 1 cm.                                          13

Figure 4. Slab 2 of the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation. A, 3D

 photogrammetry model of in-situ slab 2 created using Reality Capture™ 

1.3, white squares outline study areas 2A and 2B. B, Illustration of traces 

on Specimen 2A. C, Illustration of traces on Specimen 2B. B and C 

illustrate sedimentary structures and trace fossils (medium grey, unlined 

= mudcrack; dark grey, outlined elliptical/circular = Taenidium and 

Rusophycus; black, circular = Arenicolites U-shaped burrows; patterned, 

unlined = Diplichnites) created using Adobe Illustrator used in 

calculations and k-means analysis. Scale = 1 cm.                                          14

Figure 5. Slab 3 of the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation. A, 3D photogrammetry model of in-situslab 3 created using Reality Capture™ 

1.3, white squares outline study areas 3A, 3B, and 3C. B, Illustration of 

traces on Specimen 3A. C, Illustration of traces on Specimen 3B. D, 

Illustration of traces on Specimen 3C. B, C, and D illustrate sedimentary structures and trace fossils (medium grey, unlined = mudcrack; dark grey, outlined elliptical/circular = Taenidium and Rusophycus; black, circular = Arenicolites U-shaped burrows; patterned, unlined = Diplichnites)

created using Adobe Illustrator used in calculations and k-means analysis. 

Scale = 1 cm.                                                                                                  15

Figure 6. Slab 4 of the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation. A, 3D photogrammetry model of ex-situslab 4 created using Reality Capture™ 

1.3. B, Illustration of traces on Specimen 4A. B illustrates sedimentary 

structures and trace fossils (medium grey, unlined = mudcrack; dark grey, outlined elliptical/circular = Taenidium and Rusophycus; black, circular = Arenicolites U-shaped burrows; patterned, unlined = Diplichnites)

created using Adobe Illustrator used in calculations and k-means analysis. 

Scale = 1 cm.                                                                                                  16

Figure 7. Slab 5 of the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation. A, 3D photogrammetry model of ex-situslab 5 created using Reality Capture™ 

1.3. B, Illustration of traces on Specimen 5A. B illustrates sedimentary 

structures and trace fossils (medium grey, unlined = mudcrack; dark grey, outlined elliptical/circular = Taenidium and Rusophycus; black, circular = Arenicolites U-shaped burrows; patterned, unlined = Diplichnites)

created using Adobe Illustrator used in calculations and k-means analysis. 

Scale = 1 cm.                                                                                                  17

Figure 8. Arenicolites (simple U-shaped burrows) of the Ringgold 

Member, Sequatchie Formation. Specimen 5A, black circles show 

Location of burrows. Scale = 1 cm.                                                               18

Figure 9. Diplichnites walking traces of the Ringgold Member, 

Sequatchie Formation. Specimen 5A, black arrows represent the 

tracemaker’s direction of movement. Scale = 1 cm.                                      19

Figure 10. Diplichnites walking traces of the Ringgold Member, 

Sequatchie Formation. Specimen 3B, black arrows represent the 

tracemaker’s direction of movement. Scale = 1 cm.                                      20

Table 1. Ringgold Member rock slab ichnofossils and sedimentary 

structures.                                                                                                       22

Figure 11. Histogram of the Taenidium burrow cross-section area (cm2

in one-centimeter intervals from the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie 

Formation.                                                                                                      22

3.2 Taenidium and Rusophycus distances from mudcracks                                       23

Figure 12. Histogram of the distance (cm) of trilobite burrows 

(Taenidium and Rusophycus) from their nearest mudcrack in one-

centimeter intervals from the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie Formation.     24

3.3 Burrow statistical distribution in relation to adjacent burrows                            24

Figure 13. K-means clustering analysis representing Taenidium and 

Rusophycus trilobite burrow clusters (K = number of clusters) spatially 

analyzing trace fossils located at the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie 

Formation. Specimens 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B are represented by XY 

plots (left) locating each burrow and sectioning each cluster into colors 

(black, red, green, and blue) created using RStudio™. Spatial maps 

(right) plot each cluster mean with matching colors to each clustering 

for each specimen, indicating their proximity to surrounding mudcracks, 

created using Adobe Illustrator.                                                                     26

Figure 14. K-means clustering analysis representing Taenidium and 

Rusophycus trilobite burrow clusters (K = number of clusters) spatially 

analyzing trace fossils located at the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie 

Formation. Specimens 3A, 3B, and 3C are represented by XY plots 

(left) locating each burrow and sectioning each cluster into colors 

(black, red, green, and blue) created using RStudio™. Spatial maps 

(right) plot each cluster mean with matching colors to each clustering 

for each specimen, indicating their proximity to surrounding mudcracks, 

created using Adobe Illustrator.                                                                     27

Figure 15. K-means clustering analysis representing Taenidium and 

Rusophycus trilobite burrow clusters (K = number of clusters) spatially 

analyzing trace fossils located at the Ringgold Member, Sequatchie 

Formation. Specimens 4A and 5A are represented by XY plots (left) 

locating each burrow and sectioning each cluster into colors (black, red, 

green, and blue) created using RStudio™. Spatial maps (right) plot each 

cluster mean with matching colors to each clustering for each specimen, indicating their proximity to surrounding mudcracks, created using 

Adobe Illustrator.                                                                                            28

            Table 2. K-means cluster distance to nearest mudcrack by specimen.          29

3.4 Diplichnites Trilobite Tracks                                                                               29

3.5 “Dimples” or U-shaped Arenicolites burrows                                                      30

Figure 16. Histogram of the U-shaped Arenicolites burrow/“dimple” 

cross-section areas (cm2) in one-centimeter intervals from the Ringgold 

Member, Sequatchie Formation.                                                                    32

3.6 Clay Clasts                                                                                                            32

Discussion                                                                                                                              33

4.1 Trilobite burrow-desiccation crack intersection and spatial analysis                   34

4.2 Arthropod burrow-U-shaped burrow association                                                 35

Figure 17. Diagram representing trace fossils present at the Ringgold 

Member of the Sequatchie Formation and possible feeding methods. A, 

trilobite trace fossil ichnogenera DiplichnitesTaenidium, and 

Rusophycus (left); and, Arenicolites simple U-shaped burrow (right). B, 

Taenidium feeding burrow, trilobite burrows into the sediment to feed on 

organic material trapped in mudcrack crevice. C, Taenidium hunting 

burrow, trilobite burrows into the sediment to hunt the infaunal species responsible for Arenicolites traces.                                                                      36

References                                                                                                                              38

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
关键词
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
最新修改 Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files