Abstract
A unique feature of business groups is that firms that
are legally independent are bound together through various coupling
ties. The role of internal coupling structure in business groups is
a central concern in the business group literature. Yet we have an
incomplete understanding of the coupling effects on the performance
of business groups. Previous studies present conflicting arguments
and provide mixed evidence on the topic, and most studies focus on
the performance of affiliated firms, while little is known about
group-level performance.
This dissertation investigates how the extent of
coupling among affiliated firms in a group affects their
performance and that of business groups. Coupling creates
interdependence among group firms and facilitates supports within
groups. Moreover, coupling buffers group firms from environmental
selection so that coupled groups sustain weak firms that would have
failed otherwise. Such mutual assistance and protection within
tightly coupled groups are likely to increase group firms' survival
chances, especially in resource-scarce environments, and stabilize
firm profitability over time. However, such interdependence is a
double-edged sword because tight coupling compounds risk within
groups. Protecting weak firms also makes the whole group vulnerable
to environmental selection. Therefore, tight coupling is likely to
increase group failure rates.
Longitudinal analyses of 15,307 affiliated firms and
5,850 Korean business groups over a 20-year period, 1988-2007,
support my predictions. Tight coupling among affiliated firms in a
group through corporate governance (family ownership and intragroup
shareholdings) and internal transactions decreases firm failure
rate and increases group failure rate, especially in scarce
environments. Also, tight coupling through corporate governance and
internal transactions reduces the variance of firm profitability
over time.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
………………………………………………………………………..……
1
Types of Coupling
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
2
Coupling through governance
…………………………………………………………………………3
Coupling through internal trades
……………………………………………………………………
5
Why Coupled Together?
………………………………………………………………………………………….
7
Unclear Effects of Internal Coupling Structure on
Business Groups
…………………………
10
Dissertation Overview
………………………………………………………………………………………………14
CHAPTER 2: BEING TIGHTLY COUPLED: INTERNAL COUPLING
STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL SCARCITY, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF
AFFILIATED FIRMS IN BUSINESS GROUPS
Introduction
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
16
Internal Coupling Structure and the Performance of Group
Affiliated Firms …………
19
Moderating Effect of Environmental Scarcity
…………………………………………….
22
Types of Coupling
………………………………………………………………………………………
24
Method
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
29
Context: South Korea
………………………………………………………………………………….
29
Data sources
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
31
Sample
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
33
Dependent Variables
…………………………………………………………………………………..
34
Independent Variables
…………………………………………………………………………………
35
Moderating Variable
…………………………………………………………………………………..
37
Estimation
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
38
Estimation models of firm failure rate
…………………………………………………………
38
Estimation models of the variance of firm
profitability
………………………………
43
Results
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
45
Discussion and Conclusions
……………………………………………………………………………………
50
CHAPTER 3: DIVIDED WE STAND, UNITED WE FALL: INTERNAL
COUPLING STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL SCARCITY, AND BUSINESS GROUP
FAILURE
Introduction
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
54
Effects of Internal Coupling Structure on Business Group
Failure
………………………….
57
Moderating Effect of Environmental Scarcity
…………………………………………….
59
Types of Coupling
………………………………………………………………………………………
61
Methods
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
64
Context, Data Sources, and Sample
……………………………………………………………
64
Analysis Model and Dependent Variable
…………………………………………………….
66
Independent Variables
…………………………………………………………………………………
69
Moderating Variable
………………………………………………………………………………….
70
Control Variables
……………………………………………………………………………………….
70
Results
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
71
Robustness check
……………………………………………………………………………………….
75
Discussion and Conclusions
……………………………………………………………………………………
78
References
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
82
About this Dissertation
Rights statement
- Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School |
|
Department |
|
Degree |
|
Submission |
|
Language |
|
Research Field |
|
关键词 |
|
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor |
|
Committee Members |
|