Metacognition in Self-derivation across Development Restricted; Files Only

Dugan, Jessica A. (Fall 2020)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/wm117q18c?locale=en%5D
Published

Abstract

The acquisition of knowledge is a crucial task across the lifespan. A pervasive means by which knowledge is acquired is self-derivation through the integration of separate yet related episodes of new learning. Though successful self-derivation of new knowledge has been observed in individuals across development, from early childhood and into adulthood, there is considerable age-related and individual variability in the success one experiences. Metacognition, “thinking about thinking,” may be related to age-related and individual variability observed in self-derivation performance. This is because metacognition may support learners monitoring their knowledge for the facts necessary to self-derive new knowledge and it may also facilitate the steps necessary to successfully integrate and derive new knowledge. In 3 studies, we investigated the relation between self-derivation and metacognition. In the first direct examination of adults' self-derivation and metacognition, adults made judgments about how well they believed they learned facts necessary to self-derive new knowledge. In Study 1, adults were more likely to self-derive when they made a judgment about one or both of the necessary facts than when they did not make a judgment. In Study 2, a cross-sectional examination of children’s metacognition about their self-derivation, there was not significant age-related change in the relation between children’s metacognitive accuracy and their self-derivation performance. However, the accuracy of confidence judgments made after answering self-derivation questions was significantly related to self-derivation performance suggesting that children can successfully monitor their self-derivation. Study 3 was a 3-year longitudinal investigation of children’s self-derivation and metacognition. Results revealed significant stability in self-derivation performance from year to year. Children’s metacognition about their self-derivation did not begin to stabilize until Year 3 when children’s predictions about their performance were related to the previous year’s predictions. Taken together, these data suggest that metacognition about self-derivation undergoes significant development in late childhood and that children can glean some information about their self-derivation performance through metacognitive monitoring. More broadly, these results suggest that metacognition likely needs to be actively engaged to be most effective in the context of self-derivation across development.

Table of Contents

List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………..1

List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………….................3

General Introduction …………………………………………………………………...................4

Study 1 …………………………………………………………………………………………..17

           Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………..18

Method …………………………………………………………………………………..25

Results …………………………………………………………………………...............28

           Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………….31

           References …………………………………………………………………………….…36

           Tables ……………………………………………………………………........................40

           Figures …………………………………………………………………………...............42

           Appendix …………………………………………………………………………...........45

Study 2 ………………………………………………………………………………..................46

           Introduction …………………………………………………………………...................47

           Method …………………………………………………………………………………..54

           Results ………………………………………………………………………...................60

           Discussion ………………………………………………………….................................64

           References ……………………………………………………………………………….72

           Tables ………………………………………………………………………....................77

           Figures …………………………………………………………………………………...81

           Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………82

Study 3 …………………………………………………………………………………………..84

           Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………...85

           Method …………………………………………………………………………………..93

           Results …………………………………………………………………………………..98

           Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………...106

           References …………………………………………………………………...................115

           Tables …………………………………………………………………………………..119

           Figures ………………………………………………………………………………….130

General Discussion …………………………………………………………………………….131

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files