Oliphant’s Obstruction: An Analysis of How Oliphant v. Suquamish Obstructs Justice for Indigenous Survivors of Domestic and Sexual Abuse and Proposal for Congressional Abrogation Open Access

Rubinstein, Sophia (Spring 2026)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/w37638544?locale=en
Published

Abstract

The jurisdictional barriers created by the 1978 decision in Oliphant v. Suquamish have prevented Indigenous women who survive domestic and sexual violence from pursuing justice within Tribal courts. This thesis examines those barriers from both a historical and personal lens. Previous research has demonstrated that Indigenous women face disproportionate rates of sexual and domestic violence at the hands of non-Native offenders. It also shows that these attacks are amplified by Tribes’ inability to prosecute such offenders within their courts. Using evidence from court documents, letters, and interviews, this thesis identifies the specific areas of obstruction within the United States legal system and pairs them with testimony to the lived consequences that these barriers create. After establishing the multiple levels of jurisdictional barriers, this thesis proposes a solution in the form of Congressional abrogation of Oliphant through the Violence Against Women Act, granting Tribes full and unconditional jurisdiction to prosecute crimes of violence against women. Moreover, the solution utilizes a survivor-dictated jurisdictional framework, where the survivors can select one of multiple legal jurisdictional options to pursue their case. Restoring Tribes’ ability to prosecute offenders through a “survivor-choice” model does not just restore sovereignty to Indigenous legal institutions, but to the surviving women themselves. 

Table of Contents

Chapter One: Introduction 1

Chapter Two: The Development of US-Indigenous Law as a Tool for Exploitation 6

Logic of the Decision 13

Immediate Impact 15

Chapter Three: Navigating a Jurisdictional Maze 23

Crime Reporting and First Response 25

Investigation and Service Allocation 31

Trial Proceedings and Sentencing 35

Chapter Four: Defining Terms and Their Context: A Brief History of Violence Against Women on Indigenous Land 39

Chapter Five: Oliphant’s Obstruction Through Lived Testimony 44

Method of Discussion 44

Through the Loopholes: A Narrative Oriented Account of American Legal Failures 49

Chapter Six: Recommendations 68

Existing Solutions and Their Efficacy 68

Survivor’s Choice: A Proposal for Remediation of Oliphant 72

Reasons to Prefer This Proposal 79

Chapter Seven: Conclusion 89

Works Cited 93

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files