Identity, Ideology, and Strategic Context in Congressional Elections Restricted; Files Only

Snipes, Alexandra (Summer 2026)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/vx021g77p?locale=en
Published

Abstract

This dissertation examines how candidate identity, ideology, and electoral context shape candidate emergence, campaign strategy, and electoral outcomes in U.S. congressional elections. I argue that gender-ideology stereotypes, particularly the perception that women are more liberal than men, operate differently across racial identity, district competitiveness, and party, producing divergent pathways to office. Drawing on observational analyses of congressional primary candidates, a regression discontinuity design, and a survey experiment, I show that these effects are far from uniform, varying in consequential ways across party, race, and ideological positioning. Together, these findings emphasize the importance of disaggregating women candidates to uncover how gender, race, party, and ideology interact with political context to shape candidate success.

Table of Contents

Introduction Race-Gender Stereotypes and Primary Elections Gender, Ideology, and General Election Success: Which Women Face a Penalty? Trump in Heels: The Double Bind and Republican Women Candidates Conclusion

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files