Well, Well, Well…: A Secondary Data Analysis of Risk Factors for the Presence and Consumption of Arsenic-Contaminated Water in Hand-Pumped Tubewells in Narail District, Bangladesh Open Access

Mahmood, Mahnoor (Spring 2019)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/vx021g21t?locale=pt-BR%2A
Published

Abstract

In one of the largest contemporary environmental crises in the world, an estimated 20-35 million Bangladeshis are chronically exposed to arsenic concentrations exceeding 0.05 mg/L through their groundwater-based drinking hand pumps. In low-resource settings like Narail, Bangladesh, it is important to identify tubewell attributes that increase the risk of their arsenic contamination as well as household attributes that increase the risk of consumption of arsenic-contaminated water, so that key characteristics may be targeted through exposure mitigation efforts. Purpose: The aims of this thesis are to: 1) To examine the association between tubewell attributes and the presence of arsenic contamination in household tubewells. 2) To examine the association between household attributes and the presence of arsenic contamination in household tubewells. 3) To examine the association between household attributes and the consumption of drinking water from an arsenic-unsafe alternative source, among those who have arsenic-contaminated household tubewells. Results: It was found that between two tubewells that differ in depth by 500 feet but have the same number of years since installation and ownership status, the shallow tubewell has 233 times the odds of containing unsafe levels of arsenic (p < 0.0001). Government-owned tubewells are less likely to be unsafe than privately-owned tubewells (p = 0.0455). Households whose primary source of income is the service industry are more likely to have unsafe tubewells (p = 0.0053). Furthermore, approximately 35% of respondents who switched from their unsafe tubewell did so to another unsafe tubewell. Among those who switched, older respondents were more likely to switch to unsafe tubewells than their younger counterparts (p = 0.0133). Recommendations: Public health professionals working in exposure mitigation efforts in this region should promote the equitable installation of sufficiently deep tubewells, and closely consider the role government can play in their installation, operation, and maintenance. Furthermore, arsenic risk communication strategies should be amended to reflect the dose-response nature of arsenic exposure to promote effective and feasible switching behaviors. Lastly, a targeted effort must be made to ensure access to safe water for high-risk subpopulations, such as those working in the service industry.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.         Introduction    1

2.         Literature Review       5

2.1.      Adverse Effects of Arsenic Exposure  5

2.1.1.   Adverse Effects on Physical Well-Being         5

2.1.2.   Adverse Effects on Social Well-Being7

2.1.3.   Adverse Effects on Economic Well-Being       8

2.2.      Tubewell Attributes and Arsenic Concentration        8

2.2.1.   Tubewell Depth and Arsenic Concentration  9

2.2.2.   Tubewell Installation Year and Arsenic Concentration          10

2.2.3.   Tubewell Ownership and Arsenic Concentration       10

2.3.      Household Attributes and Arsenic Concentration     11

2.3.1.   Demographic Characteristics11

2.3.2.   Socioeconomic Characteristics           12

2.3.3.   WASH-Related Characteristics           14

2.4.      Arsenic Mitigation      15

2.4.1.   Arsenic Mitigation Activities and Technologies         15

2.4.2.   Factors Influencing the Decision to Switch to a Safe Water Option  15

2.4.3.   Considerations for Water Safety in Arsenic Mitigation Activities      17

3.         Methods         21

3.1.      Dataset Properties      21

3.2.      Data Cleaning  23

3.3.      Exploratory Analysis   23

3.4.      Exploring Associations through Regression Models  24

3.4.1.   Association of Tubewell Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell      24

3.4.2.   Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell   25

3.4.3.   Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Drinking Water Source            26

4.         Results27

4.1.      Exploratory Analysis   27

4.2.      Association of Tubewell Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell      34

4.2.1.   Bangladeshi Threshold           34

4.2.2.   WHO Threshold          35

4.2.3.   Continuous Arsenic Value      36

4.3.      Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell   37

4.3.1.   Bangladeshi Threshold           37

4.3.2.   WHO Threshold          38

4.3.3.   Continuous Arsenic Value      40

4.4.      Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Alternative Source of Drinking Water40

4.4.1.   Bangladeshi Threshold           40

4.4.2.   WHO Threshold          41

5.         Discussion       44

5.1.      Key Findings    44

5.2.      Discussion on Exploratory Analysis    44

5.3.      Discussion on the Association of Tubewell Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell45

5.4.      Discussion on the Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Household Tubewell          46

5.5.      Discussion on the Association of Household Attributes and Contamination of Alternative Source of Drinking Water       47

5.6.      Limitations      47

6.         Recommendations     49

7.         References      51

8.         Appendices     57

8.1.      Appendix A     57

8.2.      Appendix B      61

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files