(En)gendering the Negotiation Table: Investigating the Determinants of Women's Substantive Inclusion in Formal Peace Processes Open Access

Carroll, Lucy (Spring 2024)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/r207tq808?locale=en
Published

Abstract

In 2000, the U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), formally acknowledging the indispensable role of women’s full and equal participation in conflict resolution, peacekeeping, peacebuilding, and in post-conflict reconstruction. While policy reports have consistently integrated recommendations aligned with the tenets outlined in UNSCR 1325, recent scholarly endeavors have aimed to empirically assess the impacts of women's presence at negotiation tables. Despite this progression, there remains a gap in understanding the determinants of substantive, or meaningful, inclusion of women in Track 1 peace processes, wherein their voices significantly influence outcomes. This study addresses this gap by assessing variation in women's substantive inclusion in formal peace negotiations and testing potential determinants of this outcome. By investigating why substantive inclusion occurs in some cases but not others, this research aims to inform policy recommendations on inclusive peace and security efforts. Recognizing the complexity of measuring substantive inclusion, this thesis offers a novel operationalization and coding process to categorize different levels of substantive inclusion, labeled “hollow inclusion,” “symbolic inclusion,” and “substantive inclusion,” thereby refining existing definitions of the concept. Additionally, it quantitatively and qualitatively tests mechanisms essential for women's meaningful inclusion, including the capacity of women’s civil society networks, women’s political participation, and the presence of U.N. bodies in peace processes.

My findings across methods reveal a positive correlation between the presence of U.N. bodies and women's substantive inclusion in peace negotiations, which I argue might be attributed to increased international focus and targeted support for meaningful inclusion. While the relationship between women's political and civil society participation and substantive inclusion shows mixed results, my case study analyses suggest a pattern of synergistic interactions between women’s civil society organizations and UN bodies operating together to ensure women’s substantive inclusion into formal negotiations. Overall, this study contributes methodologically by refining the operationalization of substantive inclusion and empirically by uncovering insights into the factors driving women's meaningful participation in formal peace negotiations.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORY

Track 1 And Track 2

Women’s Impact On Formal Peace Processes

Understanding Inclusion

Civil Society And The Inclusion-Effectivness Dilemma

Measuring Substantive Inclusion

International Intervention And Third Parties In Mediation

Women’s Political Participation

RESEARCH DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE

Operationalizing Substantive Inclusion

Summary of Partial Correlation Test Results:

Summary of Regression Results:

Discussion of Findings:

RESEARCH DESIGN: QUALITATIVE

Comparative Analysis and Case Selection

Case Study 1: Libya, The Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (2020)

Background

Coordinating a Critical Mass: The LWPP and Women Political Activists

Symbolic or Substantive: The Role of UNSMIL during the LPDF

A Milestone for Inclusion? The Libyan Political Dialogue Forum

Case Study 2: Israel And Palestine, The Madrid Peace Conference (1991)

Background:

Ashrawi’s Roots: Palestinian Women from the First Intifada to Madrid

Diplomacy on Unequal Grounds

The Madrid Peace Conference: Inclusion or Exception?

Case Study 3: Burundi, Arusha Peace And Reconciliation Agreement (2000)

Background

Burundi Women Building Grassroots Momentum

A “Turning Point:” UNIFEM and The All-Party Burundi Women’s Conference

The Arusha Process: A Step Towards Inclusive Peace?

CROSS-CASE EXAMINATION:

CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS:

References

 

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files