Evaluation of HPV Cancer Free Georgia: Work Group of the Georgia Cancer Control Consortium (GC3) Restricted; Files Only

Dharanipragada, Sonali (Spring 2026)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/q237ht736?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Background: In 2018, an evaluation of the HPV Cancer Free Georgia work group was 

conducted to assess their organizational capacity in improving HPV vaccination in Georgia. 

Since then, there have been several changes in the public health landscape, including the 

COVID-19 pandemic, increases in vaccine hesitancy, and the global call for cervical cancer 

elimination. An updated evaluation was conducted to assess the process and impacts of the work 

group and examine changes in HPV vaccine related health disparities since then. 

Methods: Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with members and leadership of the 

work group to gather their perceptions of the work group’s function and effectiveness. Thematic

analysis of KIIs was conducted using MAXQDA 2024 to identify themes and patterns in the 

data. Using data from NIS-Teen surveys 2017 and 2024, HPV vaccine initiation and completion 

were analyzed to compare vaccination uptake between the US and Georgia, to assess contextual

changes in health disparities over time across three key demographics, including adolescent sex, 

race/ethnicity, and poverty status.

Results: A total of 10 KIIs were conducted with members and leadership of HPV Cancer Free 

Georgia. Eight themes were identified from interview transcripts, addressing current successes, 

barriers, and suggestions to improve the function and effectiveness of the work group. In the US, 

between 2017 and 2024, sociodemographic disparities in HPV vaccine initiation and completion 

decreased, primarily due to increases in coverage among adolescent males, Non-Hispanic White 

adolescents, and adolescents living at or above the poverty line. However, similar changes were 

not observed for Georgia, indicating a need for hyper local efforts to adequately improve vaccine 

uptake and significantly reduce disparities. 

Conclusions: Continued efforts from the work group are necessary to effectively communicate

the importance of vaccination in preventing HPV-related cancers to vaccine hesitant audiences. 

With the ever-changing landscape in public health and shifting trust in vaccination, focused 

efforts from the work group in coordinating systems and strengthening science communication 

are necessary to achieving cervical cancer elimination and reducing health disparities in Georgia.

Identifying subgroups with suboptimal vaccine coverage will aid in targeting outreach efforts 

and effectively increasing vaccine uptake in underserved communities.

Table of Contents

LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1

INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 11

METHODS.................................................................................................................................. 13

Qualitative Methods..................................................................................................................................... 13

Quantitative Methods.................................................................................................................................. 15

RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 17

Qualitative Results....................................................................................................................................... 17

Quantitative Results..................................................................................................................................... 29

DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................................. 33

Qualitative Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 33

Quantitative Analysis.................................................................................................................................. 37

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS ...................................................................................... 41

CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 43

TABLES....................................................................................................................................... 44

Table 1............................................................................................................................................................... 44

Table 2............................................................................................................................................................... 45

Table 3............................................................................................................................................................... 46

Table 4............................................................................................................................................................... 47

Table 5............................................................................................................................................................... 48

REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 59

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files