Defining the mechanism of substrate recognition by the tRNA methyltransferase Trm10 Open Access

Strassler, Sarah (Fall 2023)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/pc289k519?locale=en
Published

Abstract

RNA modifications are central to proper RNA function and are highly conserved across all kingdoms of life. Of all major RNA classes, transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the most highly modified with each tRNA molecule containing an average of 13 out of the 94 known modifications. Trm10 (TRMT10A in humans) is a tRNA methyltransferase that is part of the SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) family of enzymes and is evolutionarily conserved. Trm10 modifies a subset of tRNAs on the base N1 position of guanosine at the ninth nucleotide in the core region. Mutations in the TRMT10A gene have been linked to neurological disorders, such as microcephaly and intellectual disability, as well as defects in glucose metabolism. However, despite the clear biomedical importance of TRMT10A and the tRNA methylation it incorporates, there is still a large gap in our understanding of how this enzyme accurately recognizes its specific substrates to generate the pool of correctly modified tRNAs that is essential for normal cell function. Of the 26 tRNAs in yeast with guanosine at position 9, only 14 are substrates for Trm10 and no common sequence or other posttranscriptional modifications have been identified among these substrates. These observations suggest the presence of some other tRNA feature(s) which allow Trm10 to distinguish substrate from nonsubstrate tRNAs. Additionally, little is known about the specific interactions between Trm10 and tRNA that allow for this unique substrate specificity. Here, I show that substrate recognition by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trm10 is dependent on the ability of the enzyme to induce specific conformational changes to the tRNA upon binding which allow Trm10 to gain access to the target nucleotide. I also use cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to generate a 3D reconstruction of the Trm10-tRNA complex which is the first structural snapshot of a monomeric SPOUT methyltransferase bound to its substrate in the absence of any additional binding partners. Our results highlight a novel mechanism of substrate recognition by a conserved tRNA-modifying enzyme. Further, these studies reveal a strategy for substrate recognition that may be broadly employed by tRNA-modifying enzymes which must distinguish between structurally similar tRNA species. 

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction. 1

Gene Expression. 2

The Roles of RNA During Translation. 2

Regulating Translation through RNA Modifications. 3

tRNA. 4

tRNA-Modifying Enzymes. 4

tRNA Modifications. 5

The tRNA Methyltransferase Trm10. 6

Biological Relevance of Trm10. 6

Trm10 Enzymes in Humans. 7

The SPOUT Family of Methyltransferases. 7

Trm10 Structure. 8

Research Goals. 10

Figures. 12

Figure 1.1 The Central Dogma. 12

Figure 1.2 tRNA Secondary and Tertiary Structure. 13

Figure 1.4 The Structure of Trm10. 14

Figure 1.5 Overview of Research Objectives. 15

References. 16

Chapter 2: Tied up in knots: Untangling substrate recognition by the SPOUT methyltransferases. 21

Abstract 22

Introduction. 22

Phylogenetic Analysis of the SPOUT Methyltransferase Superfamily. 26

SPOUT Methyltransferase Structure, SAM Binding, and Domain Organization. 29

Substrate Recognition and Modification by SPOUT Methyltransferases. 33

Ribose 2’-O-methylating SPOUT RNA methyltransferases. 34

Base-modifying SPOUT RNA methyltransferases. 40

Sfm1: A protein-modifying SPOUT methyltransferase. 48

Role of Molecular Conformational Dynamics in Substrate Recognition and Modification. 49

Bent SAM conformation. 50

Protein dynamics. 52

Protein-induced RNA conformational changes. 53

Conclusions. 57

Acknowledgements. 58

Author Contributions. 59

Figures. 59

Figure 2.1 RNA SPOUT methyltransferase target sites in tRNA and rRNA. 60

Figure 2.2 Phylogenetic analysis of the SPOUT superfamily. 61

Figure 2.3 Overview of SPOUT methyltransferase structure. 63

Figure 2.4 SAM conformations and SAM-binding pockets of representative SPOUT methyltransferases. 64

Figure 2.5 Substrate Recognition and Base-flipping in SPOUT methyltransferase-RNA substrate complexes. 65

Tables. 67

Table 2.1. 67

References. 68

Chapter 3: tRNA m1G9 modification depends on substrate-specific RNA conformational changes induced by the methyltransferase Trm10. 78

Abstract 79

Introduction. 79

Materials and Methods. 82

RNA in vitro transcription and purification. 82

Trm10 expression and purification. 83

NM6 preparation. 83

tRNA SHAPE analysis. 84

Isothermal titration calorimetry. 85

Mass Spectrometry (MS) 86

Fluorescence anisotropy. 86

Electromobility Shift Assay. 87

Trm10 methyltransferase activity assay. 87

Results. 88

SHAPE analysis reveals differences in inherent flexibility of Trm10 substrate and nonsubstrate tRNAs. 88

Trm10 induces specific conformational changes in substrate tRNAs that are not observed in nonsubstrate tRNA. 90

Comparison of tRNA bound to Trm10 and Trm10-KRR highlights conformational changes specifically necessary for methylation. 93

Mapping of SHAPE reactivity onto a Trm10-tRNA model highlights interactions critical for required conformational changes. 96

Discussion. 97

Acknowledgements. 101

Author Contributions. 102

Figures. 103

Figure 3.1 Comparison of modification reaction kinetics for authentic tRNA transcripts and tRNAs embedded within 5’- and 3’-end hairpins. 103

Figure 3.2 SHAPE analysis reveals differences in inherent flexibility of substrate and nonsubstrate tRNAs. 104

Figure 3.3 Trm10 induces specific conformational changes in substrate tRNAs that are not observed in nonsubstrate tRNAs. 105

Figure 3.4 S. cerevisiae Trm10-KRR has similar substrate and cosubstrate binding affinities as the wild-type enzyme but lacks catalytic activity. 106

Fig. 3.5. Comparison of SHAPE reactivities when bound to wild-type Trm10 and Trm10-KRR variant reveals the tRNA conformational changes necessary for methylation. 108

Supplemental Figures. 110

Supplemental Figure S3.1 Binding affinity of tRNAs with Trm10. 110

Supplemental Figure S3.2. Stabilization of the Trm10-tRNA complex using the SAM analog NM6. 111

Supplemental Figure S3.3 Normalized reactivities of tRNAs bound to wild-type Trm10 and Trm10-KRR. 112

Supplemental Figure S3.4 Nucleotide SHAPE reactivities in free and Trm10-bound tRNAs. 113

Supplemental Figure S3.5 SHAPE reactivities of substrate tRNATrp and nonsubstrate tRNALeu bound to wild-type Trm10 in the presence of SAH. 114

Supplemental Figure S3.6 Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) of substrate tRNAGly with wild-type Trm10 and Trm10-KRR. 115

Supplemental Figure S3.7 Comparison of unbound tRNA and KRR-bound tRNA. 116

Supplemental Figure S3.8 Electrostatic surface potential of wild-type Trm10 and Trm10-KRR shown on a Trm10-tRNA model. 117

Supplemental Table. 118

Supplemental Table 3.1 Association constants (KA) for Trm10 binding SAM and SAH determined by ITC. 118

Chapter 4: Cryo-EM structure of the tRNA methyltransferase Trm10 bound to substrate tRNA.. 125

Abstract 126

Introduction. 127

Materials and Methods. 130

Trm10 expression and purification. 130

RNA in vitro transcription and purification. 130

NM6 preparation. 131

Trm10-tRNA complex formation and grid preparation. 131

Screening grid types and preparation conditions. 132

Cryo-EM image collection, processing and analysis. 133

Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) 134

BS3 crosslinking assay. 134

Results. 135

Tilted UltrAuFoil grids provide optimal ice thickness and range of orientations for structural analysis using Cryo-EM.. 135

Trm10-tRNA model shows protein binding to tRNA in a 1:1 ratio. 136

Trm10 makes specific contacts with different regions of the tRNA. 136

Trm10 binds to substrate tRNA in a manner similar to TRMT10C. 137

Trm10 dimerization observed upon binding to substrate tRNA. 138

Discussion. 139

Acknowledgements. 142

Figures. 144

Figure 4.1 Stabilization of the Trm10-tRNA complex using the SAM analog NM6. 144

Figure 4.2 Cryo-EM data collection and 2D classes. 145

Figure 4.3. Trm10-tRNA 3D reconstruction. 146

Figure 4.4 Structure of Trm10 and tRNA modeled into 3D reconstruction. 147

Figure 4.5 Position of S. cerevisiae Trm10 and TRMT10C in relation to tRNA. 148

Figure 4.6 Trm10 dimerization upon binding to substrate tRNA. 149

References. 150

Chapter 5: Discussion. 153

Validate the role of the NTD of Trm10. 156

Define the relevance of a Trm10 dimer interaction during substrate recognition. 157

Characterize the molecular basis for differences in substrate selectivity of S. cerevisiae Trm10 and other family members. 159

Final Remarks. 161

Figures. 163

Figure 5.1 Overview of main research findings. 163

Figure 5.2 Trm10 dimer has a possible role in initiating catalysis. 164

References. 165

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files