Influential Experiences on the Undergraduate Premedical Track Open Access

Seale, Jenni Kathryn (2014)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/js956g273?locale=pt-BR%2A
Published

Abstract

Over the years, the premedical track--requirements undergraduates must fulfill for acceptance to medical school--has received a lot of attention and criticism for its rigidity and intensity (e.g. Thomas, 1978; Alpert and Coles, 1987; McGahie, 1987; Emmanuel 2006; Dienstag, 2008; Gross et al., 2008; Hanscom, 2011). Specifically, there has been concern that the content and experience of the classes may push people away from scientific studies like medicine (Green, 1989; Drew, 2011) In 2013, a literature review of the existing studies about the premedical track called for more qualitative exploration to be done into the lived experiences of premedical students in order to understand the way the process shapes them (Lin et al.). This research study focuses on undergraduate students' premedical track experiences at a medium-sized Southern research university often known for its medical ties. In this research study, I use semi-structured interviews with analysis rooted in social cognitive career theory (SCCT) (Lent, Brown, and Hackett, 1994) to explore undergraduate students' premedical experiences. I particular, I examine participants' thoughts about experiences that have been central in determining their premedical persistence or discontinuation. This research builds on existing literature about premedical persistence and career choice from the SCCT perspective. Findings from this study indicate that direct experiences in a relevant workplace are more central for premedical persistence decisions than coursework experiences. The importance of these experiences may be influenced by contextual factors that shape the social climate of the premedical track. Suggestions for improved advising of premedical students are included at the end.

Table of Contents

Introduction...1

Background Information...4

Theoretical Background...15

Empirical Background...20

Research Questions...24

Methodology...27

Results...34

Discussion...56

References...62

Appendices...67

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files