A Toy Model for the Evolution of Directed Motility Open Access

Eraso, Sergio (Spring 2022)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/gb19f7252?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Nonequilibrium systems dissipate energy and hence break time reversal symmetry. As a result, a polarization vector in such systems is allowed to couple to the system's velocity vector. Thus, one expects that, generically, a polarized nonequilibrium system would exhibit directed motion along the polarization direction. However, the coupling between the polarization and the motion may be very weak. Here we conduct a computational experiment with a model of a 1-d gas of active agents (motors) in an enclosure (cell) with polarized mechanical properties to demonstrate that (1) generic values of the parameters of the system, indeed, result in a weak directed motion, and (2) a biological evolution-inspired genetic algorithm can strongly amplify the polarization-velocity coupling in relatively few generations. This toy model suggests that directed motility (e.g., chemotaxis) may be present generically in the context of living cells, and evolution may only need to amplify the taxis speed instead of performing a much harder task of evolving the taxis from scratch.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction.......................................................1

1.1 The evolution of cell motility............................1

1.2 A physical perspective: generic motility.............3

1.3 Evolution and generic motility..........................4

2 Methods............................................................6

2.1 A minimal system capable of motility................6

2.1.1 System overview...........................................6

2.1.2 Motor details................................................7

2.2 A genetic algorithm.........................................8

2.2.1 Initialization................................................9

2.2.2 Scoring........................................................10

2.2.3 Selection.....................................................11

2.2.4 Mutation.....................................................11

2.2.5 An edge case................................................12

2.3 Limitations.....................................................12

3 Results and Discussion.......................................14

3.1 Sanity Check...................................................14

3.2 Convergence to motility...................................14

3.3 Coupling between v and p................................17

3.4 Conclusions....................................................18

3.5 Future directions.............................................19

Bibliography

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files