Slaughterhouse-Five as Catharsis: How Vonnegut comes to terms with World War II, Vietnam, and the General Ominousness of the Atomic Age Open Access

Weiner, Jacob Samuel (2012)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/g445cd85j?locale=en%255D
Published

Abstract

This text explores how the Vietnam War era affected representations of World War II in literature, with a focus on the Kurt Vonnegut novel Slaughterhouse-Five. That novel, which is the story of the gratuitous Allied attack on a nonmilitary city, challenges the common conception that World War II is a "good war" by directly comparing it to the decidedly unpopular Vietnam War and by rendering Hemingwayan glamorizations of combat as absurd and barbaric. Since the Second World War was deemed a necessary war, those who fought in it often had to suppress their wartime traumas because they were expected to uphold the war's image as "good" and the veterans' reputation as "heroic." However, the ambiguity and unpopularity of the Vietnam War opened a window for veterans like Vonnegut to express publicly their grief through literature. The result was Slaughterhouse-Five, a novel that, despite its cynical tone, posits a wholly optimistic approach for wartime veterans to comprehend and cope with the traumas that they continue to experience well after the conclusion of the war.

Table of Contents

Introduction - 1
Chapter One: Historical Context - 8
Chapter Two: Undermining the Myth of World War II - 23
Chapter Three: Literary Catharsis Through Fiction - 41
Conclusion - 61

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files