Jeremiah and the Structure of Prophecy Open Access

MacGillivray, Ian (Spring 2025)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/dz010r56w?locale=pt-BR%2A
Published

Abstract

This dissertation uses the poststructuralist philosophy of Gilles Deleuze to explain the presentation (mimesis) of the prophet Jeremiah in the book of Jeremiah. Applying established exegetical methods from a novel theoretical perspective, the study argues that Jeremiah’s uniquely detailed portrayal as a prophetic character derives from the book’s unprecedented combination of mimetically divergent texts: while the first half of Jeremiah foregrounds divine revelation and other aspects of the prophet’s personal dialogue with the deity YHWH, the second half focuses instead on Jeremiah’s public proclamations and their ambivalent reception among the people of Judah. In the end, however, the similarities between the literary structure of Jeremiah and the social realities of ancient prophecy prove to be unreliable. Even if Jeremiah did exist as a historical person, he has been so thoroughly transformed by the artistry and textuality of the biblical book as to become a fundamentally different kind of being, one that cannot be understood apart from its functions in the hands of living readers.

Chapter 1 undertakes close contextual readings of certain poems of lament traditionally known as Jeremiah’s “confessions,” which reveal a significant shift in the prophet’s portrayal just before the final confession in Jer 20. Chapter 2 outlines Deleuze’s philosophy of difference through his idiosyncratic theory of structuralism. Chapter 3 then connects this theory with current social-scientific research on ancient Near Eastern prophecy, yielding a structure of “epistemic intermediation” that describes the movements of privileged knowledge common to prophecy and other forms of divination. After an analysis of extrabiblical prophetic texts in Chapter 3, Chapter 4 assesses the biblical prophetic books, with special attention to Jeremiah and others (Isaiah, Ezekiel, Amos, Jonah, Haggai, Malachi) that include at least one text detailing the titular prophet’s direct engagement with an audience. Chapter 5 steps back to consider the limitations of this structural approach and offers a different way to understand Jeremiah and the Hebrew Bible, drawn out of Deleuze’s multifaceted concept of the “rhizome.” Some implications of this concept for biblical studies are briefly explored in the Conclusion.

Table of Contents

Preface            1

Introduction: Jeremiah, Auerbach, Deleuze            2

1. Characterization in the Confessions and Their Contexts: Toward a “Mimetic Watershed” between the “Channels Of Prophecy”   10

1.1. Introduction        10

1.2. Prelude: Jeremiah as Tragic Hero (11:1-14)     12

1.3. Jeremiah’s “Confession(s)” in 11:18-12:6        16

1.3.1. Prolegomena on Terminology and Textual Units     16

1.3.2. Jeremiah’s Complaint (11:18-20)      22

1.3.3. YHWH’s Response (11:21-23)            30

1.3.4. Characterization across the Confessions: From a Downward Slope to Dynamic “Cycles”       36

1.4. A “Mimetic Watershed” in the Book of Jeremiah (19:14-20:6)             40

1.4.1. The Confrontation with Pashhur in Context 40

1.4.2. Two Modes of Mimesis in Jeremiah  46

1.4.3 Two Modes of Mimesis and Two “Axes” of the Prophetic Process           51

1.5. Conclusion: From Social Axes to Structural Series   55

2. The Structure of Structures, according to Gilles Deleuze           59

2.1. Introduction        59

2.2. Structural Components: Relations, Series, Singularities      61

2.3. Structural Dimensions: Virtuality, Actuality, “Different/ciation”    69

2.4. Structural Assembly: Serial Disparity, Paradoxical Objects, Intersubjectivity         81

2.5. Conclusion          91

3. How Do We Recognize Structuralism in Prophecy and Prophetic Literature?     93

3.1. Introduction        93

3.2. A Two-Dimensional Typology of Epistemic Intermediation in the Ancient Near East            97

3.3. Structuring Epistemic Intermediation: Knowledge, Authority, and the “Word = x”    105

3.3.1. Differential Construction of the Revelation and Proclamation Series 105

3.3.2. Paradox at the Heart of Prophecy: The “Word = x” 117

3.4. Ancient Near Eastern Actualizations of the Structure of Epistemic Intermediation    133

3.4.1. From Two Series of Prophecy to Two Types of Prophetic Literature        136

3.4.2. Between Technocracy and Autocracy: The Structural Significance of Biblical Prophetic Literature           149

4. 2 Complex 2 Jeremiah: Structures of the Book and Its Prophet             169

4.1. Introduction        169

4.2. Textual Actualizations of Epistemic Intermediation in the Latter Prophets          172

4.2.1. Prophetic Books without Proclamation Texts           173

4.2.2. Prophetic Books with Proclamation Texts   178

4.3. The Literary Structure of Prophecy in the Book of Jeremiah             202

4.3.1. Elements of the Revelation and Proclamation Complexes             205

4.3.2. Constructing the Revelation and Proclamation Complexes             213

4.3.3. Prophetic Quotation Formulas and Other Markers of the Divine Datum in Jer   231

4.4. This is (Not) a Prophet: Jeremiah as Simulacrum       253

4.4.1. Jeremiah in the Revelation Complex 257

4.4.2. Jeremiah in the Proclamation Complex        261

4.4.3. Conclusion      272

5. The Tree and the Rhizome: Three Ontologies of a (Biblical) Book             277

5.1. Introduction        277

5.2. Regimes of Signs and the Root-Book  282

5.3. Historical Criticism and the Radicle-Book      293

5.4. Assemblages, “Antimimesis,” and the Rhizome-Book             307

5.5. Only Life Can Make a Rhizome: Reading Jeremiah (and the Bible) as an Assemblage      318

Conclusion: Anti-kythera     339

Bibliography  344

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files