Work Schedule and Adherence to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Recommendations among U.S. Workers: Results from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey Occupational Health Supplement Open Access
Burris, Dara L. (2014)
Abstract
Introduction: As sedentary jobs are getting more common, leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is becoming increasingly important for preventing disease and promoting health. Both the number of hours worked per week and the type of work shift are thought to affect LTPA; however no studies have examine the relation of overall job schedule (the type of shift and its duration taken together) to LTPA levels.
Methods: Data on work schedule and LTPA of 15,649 workers
from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational
Health Supplement (OHS) were analyzed to determine whether workers
met the Healthy People 2020 guidelines for aerobic and
muscle-strengthening physical activities. The work schedule
variable included six categories: 1) a long (≥ 48 hours/week)
regular daytime schedule; 2) a typical full-time (40-47 hours/week)
regular daytime schedule; 3) a long, irregular schedule; 4) a
typical full-time, irregular schedule; 5) a part-time (<40
hours/week) regular schedule; and 6) a part-time, irregular
schedule.
Results: Using logistic regression adjusted for demographic
variables, we found that men who worked irregular shifts were more
likely to meet the LTPA guidelines than men who worked regular,
daytime shifts. There was no difference in adherence to LTPA
guidelines between men who worked long hours and men who did not.
Women who worked long hours (≥48 hours/week) were more likely
to meet the LTPA guidelines than women who did not. Type of shift
worked was not associated with meeting the LTPA guidelines.
Conclusions: These results suggest that work schedule may be
associated with LTPA levels, but the mechanism of the observed
association is not clear. In terms of lifestyle and health seeking
behaviors people who work long or irregular hours may be
systematically different from their counterparts who have regular,
daytime work schedules.
Table of Contents
Table of
Contents
Manuscript..............................................................................1
Abstract.................................................................................1
Introduction............................................................................2
Methods.................................................................................4
Results...................................................................................9
Discussion..............................................................................12
References.............................................................................15
Tables...................................................................................19
Appendices.............................................................................27
Appendix A: Comparison of Included and Excluded
Observations........27
Appendix B: Initial Model
Results.................................................31
Appendix C: SAS/SUDAAN Modeling
Code......................................32
Appendix D: Institutional Review Board
Letter................................37
About this Master's Thesis
School | |
---|---|
Department | |
Degree | |
Submission | |
Language |
|
Research Field | |
Keyword | |
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor | |
Committee Members | |
Partnering Agencies |
Primary PDF
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
Work Schedule and Adherence to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Recommendations among U.S. Workers: Results from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey Occupational Health Supplement () | 2018-08-28 13:14:40 -0400 |
|
Supplemental Files
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Actions |
---|